Physics Test Question, Electromagnetism (induced charges) (grade 12)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics test question regarding induced currents in electromagnetism, specifically using the right-hand rule. It is noted that there is no induced current at points 1 and 5, while points 2 and 4 show induced currents. Point 3 is mentioned but not addressed, leading to confusion among participants. Clarification is sought on how the initial answers were derived. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the right-hand rule in determining induced currents.
baller2353
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Right hand rule to determine

Homework Equations


There is no equation


The Attempt at a Solution


At point 1 and 5 there is no induced current, at point 2 and 4 there is a induced current.
 

Attachments

  • ch8-pg6.jpg
    ch8-pg6.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 471
Physics news on Phys.org
baller2353 said:

Homework Statement


Right hand rule to determine

Homework Equations


There is no equation


The Attempt at a Solution


At point 1 and 5 there is no induced current, at point 2 and 4 there is a induced current.

Looks correct to me. You also have crossed out point 3 in your attachment, but didn't mention it in your post here.
 
Ohhh yess, i don't know what's happening at 3 either.
 
baller2353 said:
Ohhh yess, i don't know what's happening at 3 either.

How did you come to the answers that you gave in your first post?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top