Piecewise Rectilinear Motion Integration

LNH
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that a particle moves along a line so that its velocity v at time t is given by
5t, if 0≤t<1
(6(t)^(1/2))-(1/t), if 1≤t
where t is in seconds and v is in centimeters per second (cm/s). Estimate the time(s) at which the particle is 4 cm from its starting position.

Homework Equations


s(t)=∫v(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


Took antiderivative of velocity piecewise function, resulting in:
s(t)=(5/2)t^2, if 0≤t<1
s(t)=4t^(3/2)−ln(|t|), if 1≤t
Solved first part of piecewise function for 4, resulting in t=((2)(10)^(1/2))/5)≈1.2649, which is out of the domain of this part of the piecewise function. I do not know how the second part of the piecewise function would be solved for 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not taken the anti-derivative correctly! You forgot the "constant of integration".

If v= ds/dt= 5t for t between 0 and 1, then s= (5/2)t^2+ C. If v= ds/dt= 6t- (1/t) for t> 1 then s= 3t^2- ln(t)+ D, where "C" and "D" are constants. Since the distance function is continuous (an object cannot "jump" from one location to another) the function must be contiuous: at t= 1, s(1)=(5/2)(1)^2+ C= 3(1)^2- ln(1)+ D so 5/2+ C= 3+ D. C= D+ 1/2.

Is the object able to go 4 cm from its starting point in the first second? If so we would have to have s(t)- s(0)= ((5/2)t^2+ C)- C= (5/2)t^2= 4. Then t^2= 8/5 which is larger than 1. No, the object cannot go 4 cm in the first second.

For t larger than 1 the object will be 4 cm away when, s(t)- s(0)= 3t^2- ln(t)+ D- C=3t^2- ln(t)+ D- (D+ 1/2)= 3t^2- ln(t)- 1/2= 4 or 3t^2- ln(t)= 9/2. That cannot be solved "analytically" and will have to be solved using a numerical method.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
s= 3t^2- ln(t)+ D

How is the "3t^2" obtained? I expected "4t^(3/2)" because (1/2)+1=(3/2).
 
Bump. I thought the integration for a variable raised to a power is to add one to the exponent and divide the coefficient by this exponent. Thus, I do not understand how 3t^2 could be obtained.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top