Planck constant V in E=qV question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using LEDs to prove Planck's constant by measuring their wavelengths and frequencies. The key question is which voltage (V) to use in the equation E = qV: the minimum voltage to produce current or the voltage at which the circuit stabilizes. Participants suggest using the voltage at which the LED starts emitting light, noting that once conducting, voltage variations are minimal for different brightness levels. Additionally, there are inquiries about related experiments, particularly involving UV LEDs, and suggestions to explore past methods reported in Scientific American for measuring Planck's constant. The conversation emphasizes practical approaches to experimental physics.
Paul37
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Planck constant "V" in E=qV question

1. Homework Statement

I am trying to prove Planck's constant using LEDs. So far I have measured several LED's wavelengths using a spectrometer and from this their frequency. This will be f in the equation h = E/f. For E I put the LEDs in a forward biased circuit and am trying to use the equation E = qV to find E so I can therefore find Planck's constant. My question is which value do I use for V? The minimum voltage needed to produce a current in the circuit or the voltage the circuit eventually tends to.



2. Homework Equations

E=hf
E=qV

Thanks very much in advance.

Also, do you know of any related experiments that I could do concerning this sort of area. I was going to find the wavelength of a UV LED and find its energy by a different method (not going to look at a UV LED through a spectrometer) but I wasn't sure exactly how to do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you should use the voltage when the diode starts to emit light.
Once the led is conducting there should not be much variation in voltage for different brightness (current)
This is a standard experiment in England for the IOP based physics course
 


technician said:
I think you should use the voltage when the diode starts to emit light.
Once the led is conducting there should not be much variation in voltage for different brightness (current)
This is a standard experiment in England for the IOP based physics course

well i tried it today and a blue LED started at 2.50V but the voltage went well above 5V and the LED just became brighter.

I'm in Scotland by the way. Part of an investigation
 


Paul37 said:
I am trying to prove Planck's constant using LEDs. So far I have measured several LED's wavelengths using a spectrometer and from this their frequency. This will be f in the equation h = E/f. For E I put the LEDs in a forward biased circuit and am trying to use the equation E = qV to find E so I can therefore find Planck's constant. My question is which value do I use for V? The minimum voltage needed to produce a current in the circuit or the voltage the circuit eventually tends to.
Not sure, but maybe a look at the diode current equation would offer some insight.
Also, do you know of any related experiments that I could do concerning this sort of area. I was going to find the wavelength of a UV LED and find its energy by a different method (not going to look at a UV LED through a spectrometer) but I wasn't sure exactly how to do that.
If I recall correctly, over the years Scientific American's Amateur Scientist column has reported a method or two for measuring h using ingenious setups. A search there might turn up something useful.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top