Plane EM wave Euler's identity

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Goodver
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
For EM wave, magnetic and electrical components are in phase, meaning when E = 0, then B = 0.

Thus, I understand if it is written:

f(x,t) = A(cos(kx - wt) + icos(kx - wt))

Then why plane wave is always described:

f(x,t) = Aei(kx-wt) = A(cos(kx-wt) + isin(kx - wt))

Implying that Real and Imaginary components are not in phase, which is not the case?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric versus magnetic fields have nothing to do with real versus imaginary numbers. If you have a plane EM wave traveling in the z-direction, with the electric field parallel to the x-axis and the magnetic field parallel to the y-axis, then we have $$\vec E = E_0 \cos (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \hat x \\
\vec B = B_0 \cos (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \hat y$$ where the unit vectors ##\hat x## and ##\hat y## give the directions of the fields.

It makes some mathematical manipulations easier if we write the oscillation using a complex exponential instead of an ordinary trig function: $$\vec E = E_0 e^{i(kz - \omega t + \phi_0)} \hat x = E_0 \left[ \cos(kz - \omega t + \phi_0) + i \sin (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \right] \hat x \\ \vec B = B_0 e^{i(kz - \omega t + \phi_0)} \hat y = B_0 \left[ \cos(kz - \omega t + \phi_0) + i \sin (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \right] \hat y$$ but in this case it is always understood that in the end we use only the real part of the final result of our calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Goodver