EM Wave - Where Does the Energy Go?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of energy in electromagnetic (EM) waves, particularly focusing on the energy density in relation to the oscillating electric and magnetic fields. Participants explore questions about the nature of energy distribution in these waves and the implications of Poynting's theorem in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the energy density for an EM wave is given by expressions involving the electric field and questions where the energy goes when the electric field is at zero.
  • Another participant suggests that the amplitude of the wave is not zero everywhere at the same time, implying that energy is not lost but rather moves to different locations in the wave.
  • A different viewpoint states that the energy in a sinusoidal EM wave does not "go" anywhere; rather, it oscillates between different points as the wave propagates forward.
  • One participant highlights that the energy in EM waves appears to arrive in bursts at the peaks, contrasting this behavior with other types of waves, such as sound waves, where potential and kinetic energies are in quadrature.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the current density in Poynting's theorem, with some participants indicating it refers to any current present, regardless of its origin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of energy distribution in EM waves, with no consensus reached on whether energy is transferred or merely oscillates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of energy behavior in relation to the wave's propagation.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about the behavior of energy in waves, including the independence of wave cycles and the relationship between electric and magnetic fields. There is also a lack of clarity on the distinction between generated and existing currents in the context of Poynting's theorem.

Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
For an EM wave in vacuum, we know the energy density is given by1/2 e E^2 for the electric field, with a similar expression for the magnetic (e is permittivity of vacuum). E^2 implies that the energy oscillates as a cosine squares function if we represent the E field as E_0.cos [ kx - wt].

But since cosine squared goes between 0 and 1, where does the energy go when it is at 0?? It can't be stored in the magnetic field since they are in phase in vacuum, so where does it "go"? I hope you can understand my question!Secondly, in Poyntings theorem for the conservation of energy with EM waves, the kinetic energy density is given by E.J. Does this current density refer to a current that the E field has generated AND/OR one that was already there?Cheers guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, I'm only following an introductory course on electromagnetism myself (Griffiths-level), so I'm no authority, but I'll do my best to try and help!

Regarding your first question:
Not a very physically insightful answer, but I believe the standard answer on your question is "The amplitude is not zero everywhere at the same time", i.e. when you're at a certain x and you wait for the t so that cos(kx-wt) = 0, this just means the energy has "moved" to another x' where cos(kx' - wt) is NOT zero.

For your second question:
I'm not sure how you'd draw the distinction between a current generated by your electric field or not. Anyhow, the J in the formula is simply any current (density) that's there (in that point), no matter how it got there.
Too maybe help demistify the "E.J" expression:
we know the electromagnetic power on a particle is [tex]\vec F_{\textrm{electromagnetic}} \cdot \vec v = q(\vec E + \vec v \times \vec B) \cdot \vec v = q \vec E \cdot \vec v[/tex]
and this gives us for the power density [tex]\rho \vec E \cdot \vec v[/tex], and [tex]\rho \vec v[/tex] is exactly what we call [tex]\vec j[/tex].
So the E.J is just an indication of the (derivative of the) work delivered by the electromagnetic force on some charge, no matter how that charge got there
 
It doesn't go anywhere. The energy in a sinusoidal electromagnetic wave just happens to be zero some places and nonzero others. All of it travels forward with the speed of light.

You must be thinking that the first cycle of the wave somehow has the job of passing its energy back to the next cycle to maintain it, but that's not the case. Each cycle is independent of the others. You could have just one cycle! The amplitude is an arbitrary function, just as the amplitude of a sound wave is an arbitrary function or in any other solution of the wave equation. All that Maxwell's Equations tell you is that E and B are transverse, that B is perpendicular to E with amplitude related to dE/dt, and that the whole thing moves forward with velocity c.
 
The EM wave seems to be different from other waves. The energy seems to arrive in bursts, at the peaks of an EM wave because E and H fields are In Phase in the far field but, for sound etc, the Potential and Kinetic Energies are in quadrature and the energy in the individual oscillating parts is at a constant level.
Funny that, in and around a transmitting antenna, the KE and PE are in quadrature and there is a 'steady' flow of energy outwards- it just gets 'lumpy' as you get further away. I believe the Sums but I'd love a pictorial (yes - arm waving) explanation, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K