Planet Rotation: How Is It Possible?

AI Thread Summary
Planetary rotation can vary significantly, with some planets rotating opposite to others or at unusual axial angles due to massive collisions during their formation. These collisions can redirect a planet's spin without affecting its ability to continue rotating, as planets lose minimal energy in the vacuum of space. While the gravity of nearby planets can influence orbits and tides, it does not significantly alter a planet's rotation. The consistent rotation direction of most planets is a result of the original proto disk from which they formed. Odd rotations, like that of Uranus, are believed to stem from past impacts rather than ongoing gravitational interactions.
Godis1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How is it possible for one planet to rotate opposite the others and one to rotate 90 degrees axially from the others, and these continue to rotate without stopping?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm no expert, but the rotation of a planet is not affected by other planets; they are too far away to "notice." Moons orbit close enough to their parent to have their rotation affected, but the planets are too far apart. The real question is how odd rotations got started in the first place, not how is it they can continue. I think the prevailing theory is that massive collisions can do the trick. What doesn't get knocked completely loose is quickly reformed by gravity into a sphere (the planet) but the spin of the ball is redirected by some of the force of the impact (what didn't go into making the mess of fragments and heat.) There are not enough wild objects out there to do this sort of thing in our lifetime (close enough for us to see, that is), or at least we hope not.
As for how a planet keeps spinning, that's easy. Just spin a top and watch it. It spins for a long time because it loses very little energy to the air and off the tiny point on the floor. Planets spin in space, which is a vacuum, so no air there to lose spin energy to, and there is no point on a floor either. So they just keep on going.
 
Last edited:
the rotation of a planet is not affected by other planets

The rotation is affected by the gravity of other planets. Take Jupiter when it passes near the Earth's rotation it affects the tides just like the Moon with its immense gravity even over long distances.

I do not see why a planet traveling the opposite direction as long as its Elliptical Keplerian characteristics support a healthy orbit but the gravity of other planets would be more intense because the planet passes by the other planets more quickly.

Although the early solar system probably would not support a planet going in a different direction because of all the other large asteroids would collide more ready knocking the planet off its course into larger planet.
 
Philosophaie said:
The rotation is affected by the gravity of other otat. r
But not very much or they would all be tidally locked together.
It's because there is no real coupling that weird rotations can continue.

The planets all go around the sun in the same direction because of the rotation of the original proto disk that they and the sun formed from. They all tend to rotate the same way because of the differential rotation of this disk - but that's a smaller effect.

The odd rotation axis of uranus is thought to be because it got hit by something big.
 
but the gravity of other planets would be more intense because the planet passes by the other planets more quickly.
you mean less intense. the quicker you zip by a mass, the less acceleration you feel due to that mass overall
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top