Planetary Motion HW: Orbit Radius & Speed Around Jupiter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the required orbital radius and speed for a satellite to maintain a synchronized orbit around Jupiter. The explorer determines that the necessary orbital radius is approximately 1.59374 x 10^8 meters, with an orbital speed of about 28,207.7 m/s. Participants confirm that if the orbital speed is too slow, the orbit will be smaller, while a faster speed would result in a larger, more elliptical orbit. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between speed and radius in maintaining circular motion. Overall, the calculations and reasoning presented are validated by peers in the discussion.
k-rod AP 2010
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An explorer plans a mission to place a satellite into a circular orbit around Jupiter, the radius of the planned orbit would be R.

a)The explorer wants the satellite to be sychronized w/ Jupiter's rotation. Determine the required orbital radius in meters.
b) What must the orbital speed of this satellite be in order to maintain this orbital period?



Homework Equations


RJ=7.14x107m
MJ=1.9x1027kg
Jupter's rotational period=3.55x104s
G\ =\ 6.673(10)\ \times\ 10^{-11}\ m^{3} kg^{-1} s^{-2}

The Attempt at a Solution


a) T=√(4π2R3/GMJ)
3.55x104s=√(4π2R3/GMJ)
R=1.59374x108 m

b)v=√(GMJ/R)
v=√(GMJ/1.59374x108 m)
v=28207.7 m/s

arm I following the correct procedure on these problems? i am trying to get a handle on this planetary motion stuff and i am not sure if i have yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct.
 
ok, that's what i thought thanks for the help. and another question pertaining to this hw,...

if the orbital speed were mistakingly made slower than needed the orbit would be smaller than desired, and if it were faster than needed the orbit would be larger and more elliptical than wanted right?
 
k-rod AP 2010 said:
ok, that's what i thought thanks for the help. and another question pertaining to this hw,...

if the orbital speed were mistakingly made slower than needed the orbit would be smaller than desired, and if it were faster than needed the orbit would be larger and more elliptical than wanted right?

Not too sure how elliptical it would be in real life, but with the assumption of circular motion

Fc=mv2/r, if 'v' were smaller, the 'r' would need to be smaller to maintain the same Fc, and if 'v' were larger, 'r' would be larger as well. So yes you are correct, but once again, I am not too sure how elliptical the motions would become.
 
ok that's what i was thinking, thanks again for all your help with this problem
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top