Planetary Systems within Elliptical Binary Stars?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of planetary systems within elliptical binary star systems, referencing an article about circumbinary planets. It suggests that tidal forces from both stars could hinder the formation of planets in many binary systems. The stability of planets is contingent on their orbital distance from the binary stars, with those well outside or well inside the stars' orbits being more likely to remain stable. The conversation highlights configurations where planets can exist either far beyond closely orbiting stars or in proximity to one star in a wider binary system. Overall, the dynamics of star mass and orbital details significantly influence planetary stability in such systems.
MrMojo1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I read this article in Nature (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature10768.html) as it describes two circumbinary planets. If it is assumed that most stars have a planet orbiting it and most Binary Star systems are elliptical, then wouldn't the majority of Binary Stars system not have planets due to tidal forces of both stars? I am assuming the orbital path of the stars to be intersecting in a figure "eight" pattern (e.g. the last animation of barycentric coordinates on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycentric_coordinates_(astronomy)).

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I would expect that any planets would have to be well outside the orbital radius of the two binary stars or they would become unstable.
 
Drakkith said:
I would expect that any planets would have to be well outside the orbital radius of the two binary stars or they would become unstable.
Well outside or well inside. The cited article is about planets orbiting well beyond the orbits of a pair of stars that orbit one another closely (close binaries). Another stable configuration is a pair of stars that orbit one another by some distance, with planets orbiting closely to one of the stars. In this configuration the other star just acts as a perturbation on the planetary orbits.
 
True, I guess it depends on the mass of the stars and the details of their orbits.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top