Plasma Condensation: Can Gas Be Turned Back Into Liquid/Solid?

In summary: Anyways, the question was about water, and that had nothing to do with the universe.The conversation is about the possibility of matter being turned from a plasma state back into a liquid or solid state. In summary, the molecules in a gas can be turned into a plasma, which is a highly charged state that can be manipulated by magnetic fields. When cooled down, the plasma will recombine into atoms and molecules, but not necessarily in the same form as before. This process is called Marklund Convection. According to NASA, 99.9% of the universe is made up of plasma, but this is not a constant state and the universe has gone through various epochs. However, this information is not directly related to the original question about the
  • #1
Physicist50
Gold Member
45
0
Hi there,

I was wondering that if you took anything, let's use water as an example, evaporated it into a gas, then heated it until it became a plasma, (I don't know or care whether water molecules can be turned into a plasma, that's not the point,) could it be turned back into a liquid/solid? I ask this because I recently learned that the main difference between a gas and a plasma - and especially the changing of state as opposed to solid-liquid, liquid-gas etc - is that the gas molecules lose electrons thus become charged and can be manipulated by magnetic fields. Would this affect them being able to simply be cooled down and turned into lower states of matter of the same compound? And if so, could they be?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What's the question? A plasma will recombine into atoms/molecules very quickly if you don't confine it. They are literally just ionised versions of the original atoms. People spend a lot of time working out what the governing equations are of specific ions... and there are quite a lot of equations for even the simplest of plasmas.
 
  • #3
mikeph said:
What's the question? A plasma will recombine into atoms/molecules very quickly if you don't confine it. They are literally just ionised versions of the original atoms. People spend a lot of time working out what the governing equations are of specific ions... and there are quite a lot of equations for even the simplest of plasmas.

My question is: when the molecules settle to a liquid or solid from a plasma, will their behaviour as solids or liquids be affected seeing as the molecules have been ionised in the plasma state?
 
  • #4
No , but if the plasma had high enough densities and temperature to achieve fusion after the disruption of plasma you will get only a part of the original gas like hydrogen the other part will be a different gas like helium and stuff.

You can go read on nuclear fusion.

But sure if you just have a weak plasma then after you remove the confinement it will fall back to the gas that started it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
Physicist50 said:
My question is: when the molecules settle to a liquid or solid from a plasma, will their behaviour as solids or liquids be affected seeing as the molecules have been ionised in the plasma state?

Molecules that exist in a gas will be broken apart when they become a plasma. When you cool it back down there is no guarantee that the atoms will recombine into the same molecules again. Water itself would, as oxygen and hydrogen readily interact with each other to form water, but other molecules may not.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #6
Thanks Crazymechanic and Drakkith, I'll do some more research into that.
 
  • #7
mikeph said:
What's the question? A plasma will recombine into atoms/molecules very quickly if you don't confine it. They are literally just ionised versions of the original atoms. People spend a lot of time working out what the governing equations are of specific ions... and there are quite a lot of equations for even the simplest of plasmas.

Are you sure about that? Because even after 13.7 billion years 99% of the universe is still in the plasma state.
 
  • #8
Justatruthseeker said:
Are you sure about that? Because even after 13.7 billion years 99% of the universe is still in the plasma state.

Do you have a reference for that number? It doesn't sound right to me.
 
  • #9
Physicist50 said:
Hi there,

I was wondering that if you took anything, let's use water as an example, evaporated it into a gas, then heated it until it became a plasma, (I don't know or care whether water molecules can be turned into a plasma, that's not the point,) could it be turned back into a liquid/solid? I ask this because I recently learned that the main difference between a gas and a plasma - and especially the changing of state as opposed to solid-liquid, liquid-gas etc - is that the gas molecules lose electrons thus become charged and can be manipulated by magnetic fields. Would this affect them being able to simply be cooled down and turned into lower states of matter of the same compound? And if so, could they be?

Thanks in advance!
The process is Marklund Convection which occurs in a plasma and leads first to the chemical separation then finally condensing into what we call solids, liquids and gasses - planetary systems.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marklund_convection

But understand that in 13.7 billion years only 1% of the universe has condensed into solids, liquids and gasses - planetary systems. The other 99% is still in the plasma state.
 
  • #10
Drakkith said:
Do you have a reference for that number? It doesn't sound right to me.

NASA good enough?

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast07sep99_1/
"99.9 percent of the Universe is made up of plasma," says Dr. Dennis Gallagher, a plasma physicist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. "

If not do a simple Google search and take your pick of references. Although technically I should have said 99.9% and .1%.
 
  • #11
Hi Justatruthseeker,
Thank you for your responses, amazing to see that someone found this nearly 3 years after it started.

I haven't heard of Marklund convection before, that's definitely something I'll look into.

Thanks again,
-Physicist50
 
  • #12
Justatruthseeker said:
NASA good enough?

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast07sep99_1/
"99.9 percent of the Universe is made up of plasma," says Dr. Dennis Gallagher, a plasma physicist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. "

If not do a simple Google search and take your pick of references. Although technically I should have said 99.9% and .1%.

Huh. I wouldn't have thought the percentage was so high. Interesting.
 
  • #13
Justatruthseeker said:
Because even after 13.7 billion years 99% of the universe is still in the plasma state.
Wrong choice of adverbs. "even after...still" suggest that the universe was always mostly plasma. But the universe went through various epochs. At around year 378000, most of the plasma in the universe recombined and became neutral matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology)
Reionization occurred later (year 150M - 1B) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reionization
 
  • #14
Khashishi said:
Wrong choice of adverbs. "even after...still" suggest that the universe was always mostly plasma. But the universe went through various epochs. At around year 378000, most of the plasma in the universe recombined and became neutral matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology)
Reionization occurred later (year 150M - 1B) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reionization

Ah, that explains my confusion. I was thinking that if almost all of the gas in the universe were ionized then it would be opaque. But the following quote from the wiki article on reionization says otherwise:

The second phase change occurred once objects started to condense in the early universe that were energetic enough to re-ionize neutral hydrogen. As these objects formed and radiated energy, the universe reverted from being neutral, to once again being an ionized plasma. This occurred between 150 million and one billion years after the Big Bang (at a redshift 6 < z < 20).[citation needed] At that time, however, matter had been diffused by the expansion of the universe, and the scattering interactions of photons and electrons were much less frequent than before electron-proton recombination. Thus, a universe full of low density ionized hydrogen will remain transparent, as is the case today.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #15
Khashishi said:
Wrong choice of adverbs. "even after...still" suggest that the universe was always mostly plasma. But the universe went through various epochs. At around year 378000, most of the plasma in the universe recombined and became neutral matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology)
Reionization occurred later (year 150M - 1B) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reionization
Based on what, using the physics for 1% of the universe to attempt to describe the other 99%? I expect one would need to normalize and then renormalize the results using the wrong physics for the wrong states of matter.
 

1. What is plasma condensation?

Plasma condensation is the process of transforming a gas into a condensed state, such as a liquid or solid, by reducing its temperature and increasing its pressure.

2. Is it possible to turn gas back into a liquid or solid through plasma condensation?

Yes, it is possible to turn gas back into a liquid or solid through plasma condensation. This process involves cooling the gas to its condensation point and applying pressure to force the gas molecules to come closer together, eventually forming a liquid or solid state.

3. How does plasma condensation differ from regular condensation?

Regular condensation involves the transformation of a gas into a liquid through the decrease of temperature. Plasma condensation, on the other hand, involves the transformation of a gas into a liquid or solid through a combination of decreased temperature and increased pressure.

4. What are the applications of plasma condensation?

Plasma condensation has various applications in fields such as material science, chemistry, and engineering. It can be used to create new materials, study chemical reactions, and develop new technologies, such as plasma-based electronics.

5. Are there any challenges or limitations to plasma condensation?

One of the main challenges of plasma condensation is controlling the parameters of pressure and temperature to achieve the desired result. Additionally, the process can be expensive and complex, requiring specialized equipment and expertise. Furthermore, certain gases may not be suitable for plasma condensation due to their chemical properties.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
750
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
7
Views
789
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top