I Playing with Lagrangian and I screw up

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Trying2Learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Screw
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct application of the Lagrangian approach in physics, specifically regarding kinetic energy and the formulation of equations of motion. It emphasizes that the Lagrangian should be treated as an abstract function of independent variables rather than jumping ahead to specific solutions. The transition from abstract equations to specific particle trajectories occurs only when solving the Euler-Lagrange equations. Additionally, there is a noted inconsistency in how textbooks present this distinction. Understanding this process is crucial for accurately applying the Lagrangian method.
Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
Lagrangian, Kinetic Energy (where am I going wrong)
I am sorry for all these questions this morning.

Could someone read the attached and tell me where I am going wrong?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Trying2Learn said:
Summary:: Lagrangian, Kinetic Energy (where am I going wrong)

I am sorry for all these questions this morning.

Could someone read the attached and tell me where I am going wrong?
The Lagrangian approach requires that you treat the Lagrangian as an abstract function of independent variables. You can't jump ahead, solve the equations of motion, and plug these back into the Lagrangian and start again.

It's only when you are solving the Euler-Lagrange equations that you transition from the equations in their abstract form, to the equations that represent a specific solution in terms of a particle trajectory etc.

Text books tend to vary to the extent that they make this distinction clear.
 
Ah ha!

Thank you!
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top