I Playing with Lagrangian and I screw up

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Trying2Learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Screw
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct application of the Lagrangian approach in physics, specifically regarding kinetic energy and the formulation of equations of motion. It emphasizes that the Lagrangian should be treated as an abstract function of independent variables rather than jumping ahead to specific solutions. The transition from abstract equations to specific particle trajectories occurs only when solving the Euler-Lagrange equations. Additionally, there is a noted inconsistency in how textbooks present this distinction. Understanding this process is crucial for accurately applying the Lagrangian method.
Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
Lagrangian, Kinetic Energy (where am I going wrong)
I am sorry for all these questions this morning.

Could someone read the attached and tell me where I am going wrong?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Trying2Learn said:
Summary:: Lagrangian, Kinetic Energy (where am I going wrong)

I am sorry for all these questions this morning.

Could someone read the attached and tell me where I am going wrong?
The Lagrangian approach requires that you treat the Lagrangian as an abstract function of independent variables. You can't jump ahead, solve the equations of motion, and plug these back into the Lagrangian and start again.

It's only when you are solving the Euler-Lagrange equations that you transition from the equations in their abstract form, to the equations that represent a specific solution in terms of a particle trajectory etc.

Text books tend to vary to the extent that they make this distinction clear.
 
Ah ha!

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Cartesian velocity and generalized velocity
Replies
2
Views
827
I Writing the Lagrangians for different frames depending on how "the ball is dropped"
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Lagrangian approach for the inclined plane
Replies
21
Views
3K
A Euler Lagrange and the Calculus of Variations
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Lagrangian density of a linearly elastic string under gravity
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Why isn't the Lagrangian invariant under ##\theta## rotations?
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Flaw in Lagrangian Mechanics for a rotary inverted pendulum system? (Simulation vs. Measured)
Replies
11
Views
1K
I How to find the equation of motion using Lagrange's equation?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Lagrangian with generalized positions
Replies
32
Views
2K
I Lagrangian doesn't change when adding total time derivative
Replies
19
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top