Please check- Statistical paramagnetism.

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A paramagnetic crystal of N ions of spin 1/2, at constant temperature T, is subjected to a magnetic field B. Using the fact that the Helmholtz Free Energy is minimized show that the mean magnetic moment M is:

\mu tanh\frac{\mu B}{kT}

Homework Equations



Magnetic work:dW=-\mu_0 M dH

For paramagnetic material: H=\frac{B}{\mu_0}Energy of alignment with field: \mu B

The Attempt at a Solution



If Free Energy is minimum dF=dE-TdS=0

Using II Law of TD

dS=\frac{dQ}{T} \rightarrow TdS=dQ

and I Law of TD

dQ=dE+dW = dE-\mu_0 M dH

Gives:

dF=\mu_0 M dH = MdB

Therefore:

\frac{dF}{dM}=M

Using
F=-kT\ln Z

where
Z = exp\left(\frac{-\mu B}{kT}\right) + exp\left(\frac{\mu B}{kT}\right) = 2 cosh\left(\frac{\mu B}{kT}\right)

Differientiating with respect to B and doing some algebra gives.

\mu tanh\frac{\mu B}{kT}

QED

Anyone see any problems, I appreciate the help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please anyone? I really need this because I'm tutoring and don't want to give a solution I'm not 100% about.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top