Please could you checkif i got the 2d collisions right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lioric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Collisions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two colliding pucks on a frictionless surface, where the goal is to determine the velocity of puck A after the collision. Initial calculations of momentum before and after the collision were presented, but several errors were identified, particularly in calculating the total momentum and resolving the components of puck B's velocity. Participants emphasized the importance of correctly applying momentum conservation principles and resolving vectors accurately to find the final velocities. The conversation also touched on the potential discrepancies between momentum and kinetic energy calculations, suggesting that the problem's parameters may have been poorly chosen. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of collision problems in physics and the necessity for careful calculations.
lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26

Homework Statement


A 0.30 kg puck A, initially at rest on a frictionless horizontal surface, is struck by a 0.20 kg puck B
that is initially moving along the x-axis with a velocity of 2.0 m/s. After the collision, the 0.20
kg puck has a speed of 1.0 m/s at an angle of θ = 530 to the positive x-axis.
a) Determine the velocity of the 0.30 kg puck after the collision.


Homework Equations



total mommentum before collision + total momentum after collision



The Attempt at a Solution



total momentum before collision in x

puck A

0.2 x 2 = 0.4

puck B

0.3 x 0

total = 0.7kgm/s


total momentum before collision in y = 0 for all

Total momentum after collision x

puck A

0.2 x 1 x cos 53=0.12

puck B
0.3 x V x cos 53

Total =0.7kgm/s

Total momentum after collision y

puck A

0.2 x 1 sin 53 = 0.1597

puck B

0.3 x V x sin53

Total =0

Resolve in x for puck B

0.3 x V x cos 53
Let Vcos 53 = Vx

0.3 x Vx + 0.12 = 0.7
Vx = 1.93333m/s

Resolve in y for puck B

0.3 x V x sin 53
Let Vsin 53 = Vy

0.3 x Vy + 0.1597 = 0
Vy = -0.53

V2=Vx2 + Vy2

V2 = 1.933332+(-0.53)2

V=√4.02

v=2.005m/s


Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lioric said:

Homework Statement


A 0.30 kg puck A, initially at rest on a frictionless horizontal surface, is struck by a 0.20 kg puck B
that is initially moving along the x-axis with a velocity of 2.0 m/s. After the collision, the 0.20
kg puck has a speed of 1.0 m/s at an angle of θ = 530 to the positive x-axis.
a) Determine the velocity of the 0.30 kg puck after the collision.


Homework Equations



total mommentum before collision + total momentum after collision



The Attempt at a Solution



total momentum before collision in x

puck A

0.2 x 2 = 0.4

puck B

0.3 x 0 = ?

total = 0.7kgm/s not correct


total momentum before collision in y = 0 for all

Total momentum after collision x

puck A

0.2 x 1 x cos 53=0.12

puck B
0.3 x V x cos 53 why do you think this mass is heading off at this angle?

Total =0.7kgm/s incorrect total remember

Total momentum after collision y

puck A

0.2 x 1 sin 53 = 0.1597

puck B

0.3 x V x sin53 might not be 53

Total =0

Resolve in x for puck B

0.3 x V x cos 53
Let Vcos 53 = Vx

0.3 x Vx + 0.12 = 0.7
Vx = 1.93333m/s

Resolve in y for puck B

0.3 x V x sin 53
Let Vsin 53 = Vy

0.3 x Vy + 0.1597 = 0
Vy = -0.53

V2=Vx2 + Vy2

V2 = 1.933332+(-0.53)2

V=√4.02

v=2.005m/s


Is this right?

Probably not correct - see red above.
 
actually i knew there was something wrong
I did all of this all again since the pc froze.
previously i got it right
i knew there was a glitch since the answers looked different.
 
total momentum before collision in x

puck A

0.2 x 2 = 0.4

puck B

0.3 x 0 = 0

total = 0.4kgm/s


total momentum before collision in y = 0 for all

Total momentum after collision x

puck A

0.2 x 1 x cos 53=0.12

puck B
0.3 x V x cos θ

Total =0.4kgm/s

Total momentum after collision y

puck A

0.2 x 1 sin 53 = 0.1597

puck B

0.3 x V x sinθ

Total =0

Resolve in x for puck B

0.3 x V x cos θ
Let Vcos θ = Vx

0.3 x Vx + 0.12 = 0.4
Vx = 0.93333m/s

Resolve in y for puck B

0.3 x V x sin θ
Let Vsin θ = Vy

0.3 x Vy + 0.1597 = 0
Vy = -0.53

V2=Vx2 + Vy2

V2 = 0.933332+(-0.53)2

V=√0.5902

v=0.768m/s


is this better?
 
lioric said:
total momentum before collision in x

puck A

0.2 x 2 = 0.4

puck B

0.3 x 0 = 0

total = 0.4kgm/s total momentum before collision in y = 0 for all

Total momentum after collision x

puck A

0.2 x 1 x cos 53=0.12

puck B
0.3 x V x cos θ

Total =0.4kgm/s

Total momentum after collision y

puck A

0.2 x 1 sin 53 = 0.1597

puck B

0.3 x V x sinθ

Total =0

Resolve in x for puck B

0.3 x V x cos θ
Let Vcos θ = Vx

0.3 x Vx + 0.12 = 0.4
Vx = 0.93333m/s

Resolve in y for puck B

0.3 x V x sin θ
Let Vsin θ = Vy

0.3 x Vy + 0.1597 = 0
Vy = -0.53

V2=Vx2 + Vy2

V2 = 0.933332+(-0.53)2

V=√0.5902

v=0.768m/sis this better?

I don't expect it to be, from the way you calculated.

Step 1: calculate initial momentum. check you have done that.

Step 2: calculate components of final momentum of the block you have been given. Check you did that.

Step 3: deduce the components of the momentum of the other block. - Not the way you did.

Step 4: Add those components (as vectors) to find the actual momentum of that other block.

Step 5: Calculate the velocity of that block.
eg: I am about to randomly select some values for example - so as not to solve your actual question for you.

Let's pretend the the momentum of the incoming block was 5 units in the x direction.

Lets also assume that the components after collision were 3.5 in the x direction, and 1.5 in the y direction.

The components of MOMENTUM of the other block would be
1.5 in the x direction [since 1.5 + 3.5 = 5; the original value was 5]
-1.5 in the y direction [since 1.5 + -1.5 = 0; the original value was 0]

So the net momentum = 1.5√2 at 45 degrees

Given the second mass was 0.3 kg, that meant the velocity must have been 5 m/s at an angle of 45 degrees with the positive x-axis.

Note: I chose values that were very easy to work with - even to havng equal components so I could make use of the 1,1,√2 Pythagorean triangle.

I expect your values to be a bit more messy

Note: the use of an angle of 53 degrees usually implies to use sin and cosine values of 0.8 and 0.6 rather that the complicated/inconvenient, accurate figures, as the angles in a 3,4,5 Pythagorean are just over 53 degrees and just under 37 degrees.NOTE ALSO: there is a possibility that when you have found the final answer using momentum conservation, it may be inconsistent with kinetic energy calculations [there may appear to be an increase in total kinetic energy] The problem was that the question setter may have just chosen the speed and angle of the 0.2 kg mass unwisely.
 
thank you very much that was very detail
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top