Please help assign due 2marrow effective radiative temperature

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunshin3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the effective radiative temperature of Earth during the Archeaneon, when the sun's output was 30% lower than today. The first two parts of the homework involve using the Boltzmann equation and Wien's law to find the sun's temperature and peak emission wavelength, yielding a sun temperature of approximately 5488.14K and a peak wavelength of 0.527 micrometers. The main challenge lies in part three, where the student needs to calculate the Earth's temperature by considering the reduced radiation it receives due to the sun's lower output. To solve this, the current radiation received by Earth must be reduced by 30%, and then the Stefan-Boltzmann law can be applied to find the effective temperature. Understanding these calculations is crucial for completing the assignment effectively.
Sunshin3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
. Homework Statement

It is believed that in the Archeaneon (2.5-4 billion years ago) the sun’s radiative output was 30% less than it is today.

(i) What would the temperature of the sun have been at that time?

(ii) At what wavelength would the peak emission from the sun have been?

(iii) Ignoring the effects of the atmosphere, what would the temperature of the Earth have been at this time (i.e. the effective radiative temperature)? Assume that the Earth’s albedo was 0.3, the same as today.


2. Homework Equations
Boltzman equation
wiens law

3. The Attempt at a Solution

a)T= 4th root[5143824/(5.67*10^-8)]
t=5488.14K

b)detlamax=2897/5488.147
=0.527

I DONT GET PART 3 PLEASE HELP MEE! MY ASSIGNMENT IS DUE TOMARROW! PLEASE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have to do a better job of explaining your work in parts 1 and 2.

To do part 3, you have to determine what amount of radiation the Earth currently receives / unit time and then reduce it by 30%. You know that the Earth must radiate that same amount of energy /unit time (on average). From that, apply the Stefan-Boltzmann law to determine its temperature.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top