Please help me understand relationship between work and friction/gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter HelloMotto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work done by kinetic friction and gravity. It is established that the work done by kinetic friction is always negative because it opposes displacement. In contrast, the work done by gravity can be positive when an object is falling downwards, as gravity acts in the same direction as the displacement. The concept of "free fall" is clarified, indicating that an object can be in free fall while moving upwards if thrown. The conversation concludes with a request for examples of how kinetic friction could perform positive work, indicating a need for further clarification on this topic.
HelloMotto
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can the work done by the force of kinetic friction on an object ever be positive? If "yes" give and example. If "no", explain why not.

I've said it can never be positive because the force of friction is always opposite in direction of the displacement

the second question is

Can the work done by the force of Earth's gravity on an object ever b e positive? If "yes" give and example. If "no", why not.


I said yes because let's say somethig is free falling, the force of gravity is the same direction as the displacement.

please correct my if i am wrong!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi HelloMotto,

HelloMotto said:

Homework Statement


Can the work done by the force of kinetic friction on an object ever be positive? If "yes" give and example. If "no", explain why not.

I've said it can never be positive because the force of friction is always opposite in direction of the displacement

This is not correct.

the second question is

Can the work done by the force of Earth's gravity on an object ever b e positive? If "yes" give and example. If "no", why not.


I said yes because let's say somethig is free falling, the force of gravity is the same direction as the displacement.

Your answer here is correct, but the wording on your example is not quite right. Something can be in free fall and be moving upwards. If something is moving vertically downwards then the work of gravity is positive (and I think that's what you were meaning to say).
 
can you explain why the friction force can be positive?

And yea i meant to say something moving vertically downwards. But curious, how can something free falling move vertically upwards?
 
HelloMotto said:
can you explain why the friction force can be positive?

The work done by the frictional force can be positive if the frictional force is causing the motion. Can you think of ways that the kinetic frictional force might cause an object to move?


And yea i meant to say something moving vertically downwards. But curious, how can something free falling move vertically upwards?

The term "free fall" means that the only force acting is gravity. If you throw a ball into the air (and ignore air resistance), it's in free fall from the time it leaves your hand until it strikes the ground, even though it during that time it moves upwards, stops, and then moves downwards.
 
alphysicist said:
The work done by the frictional force can be positive if the frictional force is causing the motion. Can you think of ways that the kinetic frictional force might cause an object to move?

Sorry for bumping an old thread, but I needed help with this too...
I can't think of ways the frictional force could be doing positive work...:S
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top