Why is My IMS Setup Failing to Detect TNT with a DC Corona Discharge Ion Source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matlabma
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An IMS setup successfully detects explosives like RDX and PETN at low concentrations but fails to detect TNT. The user suspects issues with the drift tube, potentially quenching ions. Suggestions include searching academic articles on ion mobility spectrometry and TNT for insights. The user expresses gratitude for receiving an answer and encourages sharing findings for the benefit of other researchers. Understanding the specific challenges in detecting TNT with IMS is crucial for improving detection methods.
matlabma
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have built an IMS setup to detect explorsives such as RDX,PETN,etc. the setup can have the RDX and PETN spectra even in a much low concentration,but when for TNT detection,it fails to have any spectra.I want to know why?
using a DC corona discharge as an ion source
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
matlabma said:
I have built an IMS setup to detect explorsives such as RDX,PETN,etc. the setup can have the RDX and PETN spectra even in a much low concentration,but when for TNT detection,it fails to have any spectra.I want to know why?
using a DC corona discharge as an ion source
Try searching Google with "Ion mobility spectrometry, IMS, TNT" and check the journal articles that appear.
 
sorry,can not find the reasons,may be,something wrong in the drift tube,something in the tube quenching the ions?
 
thank you GOD!I got the answer
 
Would be nice of you to share the answer for us rabid researchers
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top