Please help understand the solution on Math Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter phillyolly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding a proof by mathematical induction related to the power set of a set A, specifically that if a set A has n elements, then its power set p(A) has 2^n elements. Participants are exploring the clarity and logic of the proof presented in a textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the clarity of the proof and seeking simpler explanations. There is an emphasis on understanding the logic behind the inductive step and the definitions involved, such as the power set.

Discussion Status

Some participants are expressing confusion about the logic of the proof, while others are attempting to clarify the inductive reasoning and the structure of the argument. There is a recognition that the proof may not be straightforward, and guidance is being offered to help navigate the complexities of the argument.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the proof in the context of a homework assignment, indicating that there may be constraints on the level of detail or methods that can be used in their own solutions.

phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please help me understand the given solution. Is there a simpler way of solving the problem?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    47.2 KB · Views: 465
Physics news on Phys.org
I am no expert but this is usually the proof given in most txtbooks.
The proof is board, so which part do you not understand ?

Do you know the definition of the power set ? Can you follow the logic of the proof or are you having trouble with the logic ?

Please, elaborate on your difficulties.
 
Last edited:
I don't follow logic...
 
phillyolly said:
I don't follow logic...

I don't blame you. The author has a not so friendly way of proving his proposition.

Basically, what the author is trying to do is use induction to show the if a set, A, has n elements then p(A) has 2^n elements. This much I know you understand.

The logic

The author shows that for n=0 this holds
The author uses the inductive hypothesis and assumes it holds for some K then, he tries to show it holds for K+1. This much I believe you understand.

To accomplish his purpose the author does the following. He takes a set of K+1 elements. Let's call this set A.
He then defines a set B like this
B= A/{x} [ B has all the elements in A except x ( some x ) , therefore B has K elements ]

We know by inductive hypothesis p(B) has 2^k elements, since B has K elements.

We also know that if we take every subset of A it is either a subset of B or a set that contains the element x. Now we know there are two possible cases.

Cases
1) We have a subset of A that contains x
2) We have a subset of A that does not contain x.

We know that all subsets of B lie in A. We also know that the only thing that B is lacking is the element x.

So from this we can "conclude" , based on the two cases, that for every subset of A there are two kinds; one that contains x and one that does not. p(B) is a collection of all subsets of A that do not have x . So this means there is a p(B*) which consist of every subset of A that contains x.

Considering there are only two cases we can match up all the subsets that contain x and those that do not contain x.

That is, we can form a bijection from p(B) to p(B*).

From this we see that p(A) = 2p(B) = 2*2^k = 2^(k+1)


Do you understand a little more ?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K