Plotting the position of a pendulum

bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know where I could find some information about solving a pendulum position. What I mean is a swinging pendulum and the position. The position would be the spot on the ground that a sun directly above would cast. I don't really know where to start other then the pythagorean theorum, Ke and Pe equations. Any help would be great. thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The simple pendulum satisfies the differential equation d^2\theta/dt^2= -(g/l) sin(\theta)[/itex] where g is the acceleration due to gravity, l is the length of the pendulum, t is the time, and \theta is the angle the pendulum makes with the vertical. Assuming the sun is directly overhead the shadow of the pendulm bob will be the horizontal coordinate, l cos(\theta).

That is an extremely difficult equation to solve but for small angles, sin(\theta) is approximately equal to \theta so the equation can be approximated by d^2\theta/dt^2= -(g/l)\theta which has general solution
\theta(t)= C cos(\sqrt{g/l} t)+ D sin(\sqrt{g/l} t).

Determine C and D by the intitial value of \theta and the angular velocity.
 
thanks a lot!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top