Plotting Two Masses' Orbit Using Ellipse Equation and Initial Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kepler
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



plot the orbit of two masses using the equation for an ellipse and coordinate system at one of the foci

Masses Initial Positions Initial Velocities
i mi x1 x2 x3 v_1 v_ 2 v_ 3
1 1 0.651 0.585 -0.238 -0.755 -0.828 -0.865 -0.726
2 0.931 -0.096 0.000 0.357 -0.209 0.107 -0.660


Homework Equations



\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}

r=\frac{a\cdot(1-\varepsilon^{2})}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos\theta};\,\!

\varepsilon = \sqrt{1 + \frac{2EL^{2}}{k^{2}\mu}}

L=\left|\mathbf{L} \right|=\left| \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{p}\right|

\mu = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{m_{1}} + \frac{1}{m_{2}}} = \frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}

E =\frac{\mu \dot{r}^2}{2} -\frac{k}{r} + \frac{L^2}{2\mu r^2}

k = - G m_1 m_2



The Attempt at a Solution



so all i have to do is plot r a function of theta which seems simple enough. the equation for the conic section only has two parameters i don't know E and L. so from what i understand both are constant of motion so i was so i can just evaluate them at the initial conditions plug them into, the formula and plot? am i right?

to check i calculated the eccentricity: 1.11843. could someone check to make that's one should get for the relative orbit of the light one to the heavier one?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top