Point charge equilibrium w/ line charge problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a point charge of 5nC located at the origin and a vertical line charge of 2 meters in length. The objective is to determine the uniform linear charge density required for the line charge such that a charge placed at (5.0m, 0m) experiences no net force. Additionally, the problem asks for the voltage at that point and locations where the voltage would be zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to treat the line charge as a point charge and calculates the total charge needed for equilibrium. They express uncertainty about the integration needed for voltage calculations and the changing distance in their equations.
  • Some participants question the method of calculating the line charge and suggest that integration is necessary rather than treating it as a point charge.
  • Others suggest using the superposition principle and provide insights on the correct form of the integral needed for the line charge.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the necessity of integration and the correct application of the superposition principle. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the geometry involved in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of recognizing the unknown charge as a unit test charge and the implications of treating the line charge correctly in terms of its geometry. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the unknown charge in the calculations.

oddlogic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a charge located at the origin of magnitude 5nC. There exists a vertical line of charge, 2 meters in length, that runs from (2m,-1m) to (2m,1m).
a) What uniform linear charge density must this line of charge have in order that the net force on a charge placed at (5.0m, 0m) has no net force acting on it?
b) What would be the voltage at this point?
c) aside from x = +/- (infty), where (if at all) would the voltage be zero?

Q1= 5nC. I called the line charge Q2. This could be very wrong. Q3 is the unknown.


Homework Equations


F = (Q1Q2)/r^2
(delta)V = Ke(integral) dq/r
dq = (lambda)(dx)

The Attempt at a Solution


I treated the line charge as a point charge by saying:
F13 - F23 = 0 (the force of 1 on three and the force of the line charge acting on 3 must be zero)

This meant that the total charge for Q2 was -1.8nC. To find rho (charge density) I just took 1.8nC and divided by 2, since that is the length of the line of charge.

part b is a little trickier but I think it must be something akin to integrating from -1 to 1 for the integral of (Ke)(dq)/(y), but that doesn't seem quite right since we have Q3 to think about and also because "r" (which in this equation is "y") changes as we go from -1 to 1, so r must be something besides just "y". Obviously, dq is now (lambda)(dy). Ke and lambda are constants, so it should just be dy/r, whatever r is. could r = [(1-y)^2 + 4]?

I have seen (and know how to solve) point charge problems on an X axis that look a lot like this, but the fact that the Q3 is unknown (and my method for solving for Q2 could be wrong) and the y integration is kind of throwing me. Help? (but not too much)

Thanks,

Brad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all it is important to recognise that you have just one unknown and that is q2. Think of q3 as a unit test charge. You do not need its value in this problem.

Also I think you method of calculating q2 is not quite right -- you need to perform an integration and cannot treat the line s a point charge.

Tell me how you get on.
 
I saw that yesterdayafternoon. So we use the superposition formula and account for all charges, in this case 2, and integrate q2. The integral should look like this?
(Lambda)*(int) dy/r^2, where r is the square root of ([1-y)^2+2^2], yes?

Thanks,

Brad
 
Superposition principle is the correct approach as you point out and q1 is easier. For the integral, the expression in terms of r is correct (ignoring some constants) but not r itself which should be:

y^2 + 3^2

Check that you agree by relooking at the geometry (the coordinates are in terms of (x,y) )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K