Point Charge Problem: Net Force Calculation

azila
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two Positive charges q1 = q2= 2.0 microC are located at x=0, y = .30 m and x =0, y =-.30m. Third point charge Q =4.0 microC is located at x=.40 m, y = 0. What is the net force magnitude and the direction on charge q1 exerted by the other two charges.


Homework Equations


coulomb's law


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so this is what I did. I drew the charges and then for the point charge Q acting on q1, i drew out the components and everything. So, first I just solved for the F(Q on q1)=k(Qq1)/(.50^2). I found the .50 through the pythagorean theorem. So I get .29 N. Then for the components. I solved that by having the x component be negative since cos is negative in the second quadrant and y component is positive since sin is positive in the second quadrant. I got the respective values to be -.17 and .23. Then I did F(q2 on q1). There is no x component and there is only a y component. The y component through coulomb's law, comes out to -.1 since they both are positive and so they repel. So, the Fx is -.17 and Fy is .23-.1 which is .13 N. I found the resultant to be .21 and theta to be 37 degrees. However, this is not the right answer. Any thing that I am doing wrong??Or am i not even following the steps correctly..I would appreciate any help. Thanks..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
azila said:

Homework Statement


Two Positive charges q1 = q2= 2.0 microC are located at x=0, y = .30 m and x =0, y =-.30m. Third point charge Q =4.0 microC is located at x=.40 m, y = 0. What is the net force magnitude and the direction on charge q1 exerted by the other two charges.


Homework Equations


coulomb's law


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so this is what I did. I drew the charges and then for the point charge Q acting on q1, i drew out the components and everything. So, first I just solved for the F(Q on q1)=k(Qq1)/(.50^2). I found the .50 through the pythagorean theorem. So I get .29 N. Then for the components. I solved that by having the x component be negative since cos is negative in the second quadrant and y component is positive since sin is positive in the second quadrant. I got the respective values to be -.17 and .23. Then I did F(q2 on q1). There is no x component and there is only a y component. The y component through coulomb's law, comes out to -.1 since they both are positive and so they repel. So, the Fx is -.17 and Fy is .23-.1 which is .13 N. I found the resultant to be .21 and theta to be 37 degrees. However, this is not the right answer. Any thing that I am doing wrong??Or am i not even following the steps correctly..I would appreciate any help. Thanks..

Force is a vector. If you take it that a force in the positive y direction is positive (as you have done so when finding F(Q on q1), then the F(q2 on q1) is also positive, as it exists in the direction of the positive y axis...
 
oh so it doesn't matter that they have the same charges... is that right?
 
ok, i got the magnitude but the angle is not working. I get 63 and then i subtracted from 90 to get Counterclockwise, to be 27 but it does not work..
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top