Point charges of charge Q placed at each corner of a cube of side r

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the total electrostatic potential energy of a cube with point charges at each corner, and how to determine the value of a charge in the center of the cube to make the total potential energy negative. There may be errors in the calculations and the wording of the question is unclear.
  • #1
mateomy
307
0
Imagine a cube with side lengths 'r', (like a dice) and we put point charges of charge Q at each corner of the cube.
Issues with 2 subsections of this problem...

First: What is the total electrostatic potential energy of the arrangement?

Second: Add a charge -CQ to the center of the cube for what value of C will the total potential energy be negative?For the first part I've calculated the potential energy of the system to be

[tex]
\frac{Q^2}{4\pi\epsilon}[\frac{12}{r} + \frac{13}{r\sqrt{2}} + \frac{4}{r\sqrt{3}}]
[/tex]

Does that seem correct? It was a pretty lengthy algebraic adventure but I feel like it works out, its just a summation of the radii between charges (non-repeating of course).

For the second part I'm pretty lost:

I've calculated the total potential at the center to be

[tex]
\frac{4Q}{\sqrt{3} \pi \epsilon r}
[/tex]

Now, I don't know how to determine the max value of C to see when the whole potential would be thrown into the negative. Do I add the two expressions together and solve for C? I'm pretty lost. I even recalculated the potential from the first part but threw in the charge with the other eight Q's to no avail.

[tex]
\frac{Q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon}[\frac{12}{r} + \frac{13}{r \sqrt{2}} + \frac{4}{r \sqrt{3}} - \frac{14C}{r \sqrt{3}}]
[/tex]

The roots are giving me trouble to simplify things to a discrete integer. Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mateomy said:
For the first part I've calculated the potential energy of the system to be

[tex]
\frac{Q^2}{4\pi\epsilon}[\frac{12}{r} + \frac{13}{r\sqrt{2}} + \frac{4}{r\sqrt{3}}]
[/tex]

Does that seem correct? It was a pretty lengthy algebraic adventure but I feel like it works out, its just a summation of the radii between charges (non-repeating of course).

A quick BoE calculation gives me almost the same thing, but with [itex]\frac{12}{r\sqrt{2}}[/itex] instead of [itex]\frac{13}{r\sqrt{2}}[/itex]. I think you may have double counted one of the radii. The simplest method for this calculation is probably to calculate the electrostatic potential at one corner due to the other 7 charges, then appeal to symmetry to conclude that the potential at the other corners will be identical, and then plug that into the general formula for the energy of a collection of point charges [itex]q_i[/itex] at locations [itex]\mathbf{r}_i[/itex]:

[tex]W = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i}q_iV(\mathbf{r}_i)[/tex]

For the second part I'm pretty lost:

I've calculated the total potential at the center to be

[tex]
\frac{4Q}{\sqrt{3} \pi \epsilon r}
[/tex]

It looks like you've only taken account of the work done against the electrostatic force between the center charge and each of the other 8 charges when assembling the distribution. What about all the interactions between just the 8 corner charges?

Again, I'd suggest using the same formula for [itex]W[/itex] given above. This time, the electrostatic potential for each corner will have an extra term due to the center charge, and your sum will have an extra term for the center charge multiplied by the potential at the center due to the 8 corner charges.
 
  • #3
I was pushing numbers around to follow up with a different subsection which asks to find the energy if we were given charge magnitudes and radii at each edge; working backwards I figured out that my radii counting was in fact off by a very very small amount. So you were completely right in that regard. Thank you. As for the last part (part II), I'm going to have to mess around with it a bit more later on as I'm typing this whilst sitting in another class. Thanks again, I'll check back with any other issues.
 
  • #4
I'm pretty sure there's an error in my processing...

I'm getting as the total potential

[tex]
\frac{Q^2}{4\pi \epsilon}[ \frac{12}{r} + \frac{12}{r \sqrt{2}} + \frac{4}{r \sqrt{3}} + \frac{8C}{r \sqrt{3}}]
[/tex]

To determine the minimum value of C for which the entire potential is negative it looks like I'm going to end up getting some continuous rather than discrete value. Is that right? I feel like it should be a discrete answer, so I think I did something wrong. Can you point out where I'm going wrong?

Thanks again.
 
  • #5
mateomy said:
I'm pretty sure there's an error in my processing...

I'm getting as the total potential

[tex]
\frac{Q^2}{4\pi \epsilon}[ \frac{12}{r} + \frac{12}{r \sqrt{2}} + \frac{4}{r \sqrt{3}} + \frac{8C}{r \sqrt{3}}]
[/tex]

To determine the minimum value of C for which the entire potential is negative it looks like I'm going to end up getting some continuous rather than discrete value. Is that right? I feel like it should be a discrete answer, so I think I did something wrong. Can you point out where I'm going wrong?

Thanks again.

For the last term, I get [tex]\frac{6C}{r \sqrt{3}}[/tex] instead of [tex]\frac{8C}{r \sqrt{3}}[/tex], so you may have double counted somewhere again.

As for find what value(s) of C make the enrgy negative, you basically have a line in the W-C plane, so anywhere before the C-intercept, the work will be negative.

As a side note, I really dislike the wording of the 2nd part of the question. Potential energy is really only defined up to a constant, so you can change what value of C makes it zero, simply by adding a constant to the energy (the dynamics that result will be identical!). I'd much prefer if the question was asking about the work needed to assemble the charge distribution from infinity, because that is a unique quantity, and probably what the questioner expects you to use as "the" potential energy...just something you may wish to point out to your professor (or not, depending on their temperment)
 
  • #6
Great! Thanks for the help. As for the wording...it's funny you mention that because when I first read the question I was confused for a little bit, "What is this asking?". Stranger still we're using the Griffiths book and he mentions what a horrible "misnomer" Potential is. Guess I'm getting a first hand account.

Thanks again.
 
  • #7
ED

please upload the complete derivation..thanks
 
  • #8
20151012_212227 (960x1280).jpg
20151012_212236 (960x1280).jpg

[itex]U_e=\frac{q^2}{4\pi \epsilon_oa}\left ( 13+\frac{11}{\sqrt{2}} +\frac{4}{\sqrt{3}}\right )[/itex]
 

1. What is the electric field at the center of the cube?

The electric field at the center of the cube is zero. This is because the electric fields from each of the point charges cancel out each other at this point due to the symmetry of the cube.

2. How do the electric fields at the corners of the cube add up?

The electric fields at the corners of the cube add up to a net electric field of zero. This is because the direction and magnitude of the electric field at each corner is equal and opposite to the electric field at the opposite corner, resulting in a net cancellation of electric field.

3. What is the net force on a point charge placed at the center of the cube?

The net force on a point charge placed at the center of the cube is zero. This is because the electric forces from each of the point charges cancel out each other at this point due to the symmetry of the cube.

4. How does the distance between the point charges affect the electric field at the center of the cube?

The distance between the point charges does not affect the electric field at the center of the cube. This is because the electric fields from each of the point charges cancel out each other at this point, regardless of the distance between them.

5. Can the number of point charges on the cube be changed?

Yes, the number of point charges on the cube can be changed. However, as long as the charges are placed at the corners of the cube, the net electric field at the center of the cube will always be zero.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
731
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
828
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
502
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
438
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
877
Back
Top