Poisson's equation applied to an integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thomas2054
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied Integral
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the application of Poisson's equation to a volume integral representation of potential, specifically in the context of voltage. It highlights the use of Green's function to solve the equation, demonstrating that the Green's function for the Laplace operator can be expressed in terms of spherical coordinates. The solution involves integrating over a sphere and applying Gauss's theorem, leading to the standard form of the solution for Poisson's equation. The final expression for the voltage is derived, showing its dependence on the charge density and the distance between points. This mathematical approach provides clarity on manipulating Poisson's equation in the context of volume integrals.
Thomas2054
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework problem, but a math question of curiosity. At 57 I am way past courses and homework.

If a potential, V, is expressed as a volume integral, how does one apply Poisson's equation to that integral?

If V = k∫V'\frac{ρ}{R}dv' (V on the LHS is voltage and the integral on the RHS is the integral over V', the volume.)

how do I manipulate Poisson's, i.e., \nabla2V = -\frac{ρ}{ε}?

I cannot find enough in my various calculus books to figure this out. A website reference would be fine.

Thanks.

Thomas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not such an easy question as it might seem. The most elegant way is to use functional analysis and the theory of distributions. You look for the Green's function of the Laplace operator,

\Delta_x G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}').

First of all it's clear from the symmetries of the problem that

G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=g(|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|).

Setting \vec{y}=\vec{x}-\vec{x}' leads to

\Delta_y g(|\vec{y}|)=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{y}).

Now you introduce spherical coordinates for r=|\vec{y}| \neq 0. This leads to

\frac{1}{r} [r g(r)]''=0.

This you can solve by succesive integration

g(r)=\frac{C_1}{r}+C_2,

where C_{1,2} are integration constants. Since we seek for the solution, which vanishes at infinity, we have C_2=0. The constant C_1 has to be found by the defining equation. To that end you integrate the equation

\Delta g(|\vec{y}|)=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{y})

over a sphere around the origin with arbitrary radius. For the right-hand side you get 1, and for the left-hand side you use Gauß's integral theorem

\int_{K} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{y} \Delta g(|\vec{y}|) = \int_{\partial K} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{\nabla} g(|\vec{y}|).

You easily find

\vec{\nabla} g(|\vec{y}|)=-C_1 \frac{\vec{y}}{|\vec{y}|^3},

and the surface integral thus gives

-4 \pi C_1=1 \; \Rightarrow \; C_1=-\frac{1}{4 \pi}.

So we have

G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-\frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|^3}.

Thus the standard solution for Poisson's equation is

V(\vec{x})=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \frac{\rho(\vec{x}')}{\epsilon}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \frac{\rho(\vec{x}')}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|^3}.
 
I don't know, how to edit postings in this forums, so here is an erratum to my previous one. The end of the posting must read:

[...]

So we have

G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-\frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|}.

Thus the standard solution for Poisson's equation is

V(\vec{x})=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \frac{\rho(\vec{x}')}{\epsilon}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \frac{\rho(\vec{x}')}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|}.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
685
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top