Falling flowerpotstuck on simple part

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rockdog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
AI Thread Summary
A 3.2 kg flowerpot falls from a building, and the force acting on it after 1.5 seconds is calculated to be 31.36 N due to gravity. After falling 28 meters, its speed reaches 23.4 m/s, and it experiences a deceleration of 182 m/s² when entering a viscous liquid. The force exerted on the liquid by the pot is determined using the equation F=ma, resulting in a force of 582.4 N in the opposite direction of the pot's motion. This force is necessary for the pot to decelerate and come to rest over a distance of 1.5 meters. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
Rockdog
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A 3.2 kg flowerpot drops from a tall building. The initial speed of the pot is zero, and you may neglect air resistance.

a) What is the magnitude of the force acting on the pot while it is in the air 1.5 s after it begins to fall?

b) After the pot has fallen 28 m, what is its speed?

c) After the pot has fallen 28 m, it enters a viscous liquid, which brings it to rest over a distance of 1.5 m. Assuming constant deceleration over this distance, what is the magnitude of this deceleration?

d) What is the force exerted on the liquid by the pot?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Okay, I got the answers for the first three, which are
1) 31.36 N
2) 23.4 m/s
3) 182 m/s/s

If you really want to know how I did it, I can provide that in a later post, but that's not the point here.

I'm stuck on the last question.
I know I have to use this equation; F=M*a (in the y direction)
Well, I was thinking, the object has a downward force of 31.36 N, so when it hits the liquid, shouldn't the liquid push back up 31.36N? Of course, my answer doesn't match the computer, so insight appreciated.

*31.36N achieved by 3.2kg*9.8m/s/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The object does not have a downward force of 31.36 N... gravity is applying a 31.36 N downward force to the object. (I'm not sure if you know the distinction, so I'm stating it to be on the safe side)



You know the acceleration experienced by the object. You know the mass of the object. Thus, you know the net force acting on the object! (If the net force was 0, your reasoning would be correct in spirit... but the object is decelerating so the net force is not 0!)

There are two contributions to the net force; the 31.36 N downward force supplied by gravity, and the unknown force supplied by the liquid, and these have to add up to the net force.

Once you know the force with which the liquid acts upon the pot, then the negative of that is the force with which the pot acts upon the liquid.
 
=31.36N*

For the last question, you are correct in using the equation F=ma. However, you have to consider the direction of the force and acceleration. The force acting on the liquid by the pot is in the opposite direction of the pot's motion, so it would be a negative value. Also, the acceleration of the pot in the viscous liquid is not the same as its acceleration due to gravity. It is decelerating, so the acceleration would be negative as well.

To find the force exerted on the liquid by the pot, we can use the equation F=ma, where m is the mass of the pot and a is the deceleration of the pot in the liquid. So, it would be F=3.2kg*(-182m/s^2) = -582.4 N. This means that the liquid is exerting a force of 582.4 N in the opposite direction of the pot's motion, causing it to decelerate and eventually come to a stop over a distance of 1.5 m.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top