Polarized Cylinder: Solving Griffiths Problem 4.13 with Laplace's Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Griffiths Problem 4.13
A very long cylinder, of radius a, carries a uniform polarization P perpendicular to its axis. Find the electric field inside the cylinder. Show that the field outside the cylinder can be expressed in the form
\vec{E}(\vec{r}) = \frac{a^2}{2\epsilon_{0}s^2} \left[2(\vec{P}\cdot\vec{\hat{s}})\hat{s}-\vec{P}\right]


2. The attempt at a solution

Now i was wondering if i could use Laplace's equation here... since there is not volume charge.

If i were to use this equation to solve for the potnetial

V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi\epsilon_{0}} \oint_{S} \frac{\sigma_{b}}{r} da' + \int_{V} \frac{\rho_{b}}{r} d\tau'

Suppose we were solving for points inside then bound surface charge is zero and the volume charge cannot be zero

SInce the polarization is perpendicular to the axis, then the polarization is +P for theta from 0 to pi
but for theta from pi to 2pi then the polarization is -P correct??

But how can the bound volume charge be non zero if the polarization is constant??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well i tried to solve it using Laplace's equation

the solution in cylindrical coords is

V(s,\phi) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (A_{k}s^k+B_{k}s^{-k}) (C_{k}\cos k\phi + D_{k} \sin k\phi)

Since \sigma_{b} = P\cos\phi

Obviosuly Dk is zero

For the inside we need the potential to be finite so
V_{in} (s,\phi) = \sum_{k=0)}^{\infty} A_{k} s^k \cos k\phi

V_{out} (s,\phi} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} B_{k} s^{-k} \cos k\phi

We need V_{in} (a,\phi) = V_{out} (a,\phi)
Using the above conidtion we get A_{k} a^{2k} = B_{k}

we also need the potnetial to be smooth across the boundary so
\frac{d V_{out}}{ds}\right|_{s=a} - \frac{d V_{in}}{ds}\right|_{s=a} = \frac{-\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}}

\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \left(-kB_{k} a^{-k-1} - kA_{k}s^{k-1}\right) \cos k\phi = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}} = \frac{P\cos \phi}{\epsilon_{0}}

obviously k =1

and we get A = \frac{P}{2\epsilon_{0}}

so i get
V_{in} (s,\phi) = \frac{P}{2\epsilon_{0}} s \cos \phi

E = - \nabla V = -\frac{P}{2\epsilon_{0}} (\cos \phi \hat{s}-\sin\phi \hat{\phi}the answer is supposed to be uniform though.. not have a phi dependance...

where di i go wrong?

Is there a way to do this using Gauss Law because after all the bound charge can be treated like a real charge right??
 
Last edited:
Because you are in 2D, div E=0 inside the cylinder, so the only bound charge is a surface charge sigma~P.s. Use your first equation to apply the BCs that
V is continuous and Delta E~sigma.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top