Political Motivations: Ethical Theory Guiding Presidential Admin

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inquisitor
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ethical framework guiding the current presidential administration, questioning whether decisions are influenced by religious ethics, utilitarianism, or egoism. There is a strong critique of perceived moral vacuity, suggesting that the administration operates without a true ethical compass, driven instead by the interests of the wealthy elite. The analogy to Marie Antoinette highlights a disconnect between leadership and the populace, with accusations of negligence regarding issues like Gulf War Syndrome and the handling of nuclear waste. The conversation also touches on the duality of public religious rhetoric versus the practical utilitarian decisions made in power, particularly criticizing the administration's approach to preemptive war and its implications for morality. Overall, the sentiment is that the administration's actions reflect a non-ethical, immoral stance rather than a coherent ethical theory.
Inquisitor
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What ethical theory guides the current presidential administration? Are their judgements based on religious ethics (divine command theory)? Utilitarian considerations? Egoism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is applied ignorance born of the blind privledge afforded the obscenely wealthy. There is no ethic. Remember, the players in this administration became wealthy, brokering oil, a planetary resource, from which a very powerful elite take profit. They are like a latter day Marie Antoinette, "What no bread? Let them eat yellow cake!" What shall we do with all this costly low level nuclear waste? Let us tip missles with it, and dump it on Iraq. No one will notice. Let us deny that there is a Gulf War Syndrome, and let us deny the new Gulf War Syndrome, when it manifests. These are the people that will be selling us air to breathe, one day.
There is no ethic or judgement, only the appearance of moral rectitude to keep the votes coming. There is no morality in preemptive war. The divine creator, does not call on us to kill. This is the energy, weapons, and drug business; out of the control of reasonable entities.
 
Inquisitor said:
What ethical theory guides the current presidential administration? Are their judgements based on religious ethics (divine command theory)? Utilitarian considerations? Egoism?

Its called non-ethical, inmoral, personalism.
 
Bush often speaks of religious things. If we take him at face value, then he follows religious ethics. At the same time, any person the such a position of power necessarily makes utilitarian decisions.
 
Dissident Dan said:
Bush often speaks of religious things. If we take him at face value, then he follows religious ethics. At the same time, any person the such a position of power necessarily makes utilitarian decisions.
That would be my assessment as well, except that I think Bush leans more toward the religious end to the detriment of the utilitarian. Whether that's good/bad, right/wrong...
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...

Similar threads

Back
Top