MHB Polygonal Hamster Wheel with 24901 sides.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RaAmonKhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wheel
Click For Summary
A polygonal hamster wheel with 24,901 sides is constructed from 1-mile-long wooden planks, each 4 feet wide. The angular difference between each plank is calculated to be 0.02 degrees, making it nearly indistinguishable to the naked eye. This slight deviation contributes to the perception of large round objects, like Earth, appearing flat. The discussion also touches on the size of the hamster, which is noted to be approximately 5 feet tall. The conversation explores how human perception can misinterpret the curvature of large structures due to their scale.
RaAmonKhan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A Polygon hamster wheel has 24901 sides. Each side is made from a 1 mile long wooden plank(perfectly straight) , 4 feet wide. The planks are placed together, end to end, to form a giant hamster wheel.

You stand on top of this gigantic hamster wheel (on the outside of the wheel,as if balancing on a barrel), right where plank no.1 and plank no.2 meet each other in front of you. Behind you, a mile away ...plank no.24901 meets plank no.1 that you are standing on.

What would the angular difference be between each plank where they meet each other? Would you be able to see that angular difference with your eyes?

Riddle me that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Imagine drawing lines from each "join" of two planks to the center of the wheel, There are 24901 planks so the entire 360 degrees is divided into 24901 angles each with measure [math]\frac{360}{24901}[/math] degrees. Each angle is the vertex angle of an isosceles triangle. The sum of the angles in any triangle is 180 degrees so the base angles of each triangle have measure [math](180- \frac{360}{24901})/2= \frac{180(24901)- 360}{49802}= \frac{4481820}{49802}= 89.99277[/math]. Since the "join" of two planks involves two of those, 2(89.99277)= 179.98 degrees. That is, of course, very very close to 180 degrees or no "angle" between planks at all. The difference from "straight" is 0.02 degrees. Whether you could "see that angular difference with your eyes would, I imagine, depend upon how good you eyesight is.

Exactly how big is this hamster?
 
I wanted to see if it would be possible for the person (that is standing on this polygon circle of 24901 miles circumference) to perceive the round object it is standing on as "FLAT"...

Would you suggest this would be a possibility ?
So ...if at all...very very few people would be able to see the 0.02 degrees between the two 1 mile long perfectly straight sides..?
 
The reason i am asking someone with much better math knowledge than myself this question..is to satisfy my reasoning about "why people perceive round objects of that size to be flat...when they are indeed round...or polygonal for testing purposes"
..
...The Earth is 24901 miles in circumference ...that is why some people perceive it to be "flat" ...when it is actually round.

Do i even make sense...sorry my English and grammar suck.Thank you for your input and valuable knowledge.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Imagine drawing lines from each "join" of two planks to the center of the wheel, There are 24901 planks so the entire 360 degrees is divided into 24901 angles each with measure [math]\frac{360}{24901}[/math] degrees. Each angle is the vertex angle of an isosceles triangle. The sum of the angles in any triangle is 180 degrees so the base angles of each triangle have measure [math](180- \frac{360}{24901})/2= \frac{180(24901)- 360}{49802}= \frac{4481820}{49802}= 89.99277[/math]. Since the "join" of two planks involves two of those, 2(89.99277)= 179.98 degrees. That is, of course, very very close to 180 degrees or no "angle" between planks at all. The difference from "straight" is 0.02 degrees. Whether you could "see that angular difference with your eyes would, I imagine, depend upon how good you eyesight is.

Exactly how big is this hamster?
Forgot your question Sorry...the hamster is on average 5 feet in height.
 
Wow. Now I am going to worry about whether hamsters are vegetarian or carnivorous!
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K