Popular apps have more security flaws than Windows

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a significant shift in cybersecurity concerns, emphasizing that desktop applications have become primary targets for hackers, surpassing operating systems like Windows. Despite Windows having a history of vulnerabilities, it has improved its defenses through regular security patches. In contrast, applications such as iTunes, RealPlayer, and Firefox are now responsible for over 60 percent of serious security flaws, according to British security firm Qualys. The text also notes that many desktop applications lack the rigorous security checks that Microsoft implements, making them more susceptible to exploitation. The context of the discussion is rooted in early 2006, prior to the launch of the iPhone and the App Store, indicating that the concept of applications was evolving at that time.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
Andrew Sullivan
From the March 2006 issue of PC World magazine
Posted Monday, January 30, 2006

With a spiking number of security flaws, the programs you run every day are now a more enticing hacker target than your operating system.

The Windows OS has become battle-hardened over years of trial by fire, enduring relentless hacker attacks. Although sometimes-critical flaws continue to surface, security patches applied via automatic updates have made Windows a tougher nut to crack.

And Mac users, wipe that smug look off your faces: Because these security flaws are found in applications rather than operating systems, you are at risk as well.

Desktop programs such as iTunes, RealPlayer, and even the security-conscious Firefox now account for more than 60 percent of serious vulnerabilities, according to the British security firm Qualys.
!

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,124510,tk,wbxnws,00.asp
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Not surprising, given that the desktop widgets in Win 7 were all vulnerable and later disapproved by Microsoft.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Random apps also don't have the security checks that Microsoft would have in place.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Random apps also don't have the security checks that Microsoft would have in place.
Of course they don't, as they're more eager to publish their apps rather than debug them. It's like installing apps from sources other than Playstore.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Note that OP was from early 2006. “App” had a somewhat different meaning, as the iPhone and the idea of the App Store as a walled garden wouldn’t come out for another year (and Windows 7 not for another 3 years).
 
TeethWhitener said:
Note that OP was from early 2006. “App” had a somewhat different meaning, as the iPhone and the idea of the App Store as a walled garden wouldn’t come out for another year (and Windows 7 not for another 3 years).
That's not going to happen now .
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top