Population Growth with Finite Resources:

Scalemail Ted
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



l_8c317d0b6df9413ebe0566920f5f329f.jpg

Homework Equations



<see above>

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a bit unsure how to set this up to solve for a solution. Any advice?

Its obviously a separable differential equation. But I'm unsure what it is I'm looking for. This looks different then some population examples in the book.

If I read the given equation correctly it states that the change in population (dp) in regards to time (dt) is equal to the constant rate of change (K) multiplied by the difference between the maximum population minus the population.

Then I see that my initial values are k = 0.01, Pmax = 1000, p(0) = 200, and t0 = 0.

But what do I do with this data? What am i solving for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm re-reading through the chapter now and the closest thing the original given equation looks similar to is a logistic model. Is this correlation correct?

Logistic model as per the book:

The stated expression for a logistic model is:

dp/dt = -Ap(p - p1), p(0) = p0

where A = k3/2 and p1 = (2k1/k3) + 1

If the original problem is a logistic model then my problem is the examples in the book give secondary and tertiary values of t and p(t). But the original problem does not.
 
I do not know what "secondary and tertiary values" your last paragraph means but what to do? Solve the differential equation!

It is probably done in your book but see if you can do it. Simple application of partial fractions. (We have had several examples on these in recent days. People study and do exercises in them in algebra, they are quite easy. Then when they meet simple examples of them in differential equations they have no idea again. :confused:).

Then see qualitatively what it looks like. Would it surprise you if at the end (t = infinity) the population was the maximum population? Would it surprise you if it wasn't? Does the graph of P against t or log t :wink: have a symmetry? Does the original equation say anything about that?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top