Portal Discussion: Human at Speed of Light

jannin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am very new to this forum so please let me know if I have posted this in the wrong place, and thanks in advance for any replies :)

Backstory:
My friends and I were playing a game called Portal in which you can place two portals (each of which leads to the other). We were discussing what you could do if you placed one portal right above the other (ie, one in the ceiling and one in the floor) and then began to fall through. From there, the conversation led to what would happen to a person falling through the portals in a vacuum (therefore ignoring air friction).

Question:
What would happen to a person as they approached light speed at the acceleration of gravity? Assume for the sake of the question that this person does not need to eat/breathe/sleep/etc, and that the portals are matterless and do not produce any sort of friction.

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jannin said:
My friends and I were playing a game called Portal
Nice game requiring some physical thinking.
jannin said:
We were discussing what you could do if you placed one portal right above the other (ie, one in the ceiling and one in the floor) and then began to fall through.
You would have an perpetuum mobile, which is ruled out by most physical theories. But if you want an idea, how the world would look like to you while moving close to c:
http://www.spacetimetravel.org/bewegung/bewegung7.html
 
A.T. said:
You would have an perpetuum mobile, which is ruled out by most physical theories.
Apparently it is theoretically possible to do something like this with a pair of wormholes, but energy conservation is preserved by changes in the mass of the two wormhole mouths; see pervect's post #6 on this thread. He says:
Energy will be conserved in this case via the gain and loss of mass of the mouths of the wormhole.

This, however, will not stop the "perpetual motion" machine from operating :-(. It is possible that some unanalyzed mechanism might eventually cause the wormhole itself to fail, other than that this is a definite issue.

The wormhole mouth at the bottom will get "heavier" because of all the matter entering it. The worm hole mouth at the top will get lighter, eventually acquiring a negative mass!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top