Position of image of an immersed object

  • Thread starter Thread starter nilic1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Position
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the common misconception that the image of an immersed object is always vertically above the object, as depicted in many textbooks. It clarifies that this positioning is only accurate when viewed directly from above and that the image's location changes based on the observer's angle. The use of Snell's law is highlighted to determine the angles of incidence and refraction, which affect the image's position. Diagrams illustrating the concept of caustics demonstrate how the image shifts when viewed from different angles. Overall, the textbooks should clarify these conditions to avoid confusion.
nilic1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Position of image of an immersed object.. Are books wrong?

Homework Statement



In almost every book I checked, the image of an immersed object is always vertically above the object. Is this always the case and is independent on the position you are looking from?

Homework Equations



n = sin i / sin r

The Attempt at a Solution



According to my drawings the image is only VERTICALLY above the object if you look directly from above. I used snell's law to find the angles i and r, and then located the image. I always used 2 rays emerging from the object and was extra careful to mark the angles accurately and pass through the right positions. I also tried to find some flash or java animation that could illustrate this but I couldn't find any. Are the books wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are perfectly correct.
Most books show the case where the image is viewed from vertically above. It's usually in connection with using apparent depth of water to measure the refractive index.
The books should explain that this is the case, and only relates to a narrow bundle of rays moving vertically upwards.
There is a diagram here from one of my old books which shows how the position of the image changes as you view from a point further to the right.
The images are I1 I2 and I3 and lie on a curve called a "caustic". I1 is the standard case when viewed from vertically above.
There are two caustics in the diagram. There is also the one on the left for the case when you view from the left.
The diagram isn't perfectly clear but does show the point you have correctly brought up.
apparent-depth.png
 
Many thanks, I looked everywhere for this diagram but couldn't find it anywhere neither in books nor on the net.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top