Position of stellar bodies in space.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the positioning of celestial bodies like the Sun, Moon, and Earth in relation to the ecliptic plane, which is the plane of Earth's orbit around the Sun. While these bodies are generally in the same plane, their positions can vary, with some being above or below the ecliptic depending on their orbital positions. Mercury's orbit is noted to be about 7 degrees from the ecliptic, while other planets are closer to this plane. The conversation highlights the significance of these variations, even at vast distances in space. Overall, the celestial bodies maintain a rough alignment within the ecliptic plane during their orbits.
PrincePhoenix
Gold Member
Messages
116
Reaction score
2
Do the sun, moon, Earth etc lie in the same plane? I mean are they at the same level or some bodies are above/below others? If yes than why?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
So at times one is above the other (with respect to the ecliptic), depending on the position they have in their orbits at that time? And I can't picture the ecliptic in my mind when I think of the actual movement of the earth, which is the Earth moving around the sun? :confused:
 
Hi PrincePhoenix! :wink:

I'm not sure what your question is.

The ecliptic is the plane in which the Earth orbits the Sun.

So it's also the plane in which we see the Sun.

The other planets spend about half their time on one side of the ecliptic, and about half on the other side. :smile:
 
However, they are roughly in the same plane. As you can see from tiny-tim's link, Mercury's orbit is only about 7 degrees from ours and the other planets are much closer to being in the same plane.
 
tiny-tim said:
The ecliptic is the plane in which the Earth orbits the Sun.

The other planets spend about half their time on one side of the ecliptic, and about half on the other side. :smile:
That answers my questions. :smile:
Thank you.:approve:

HallsofIvy said:
However, they are roughly in the same plane. As you can see from tiny-tim's link, Mercury's orbit is only about 7 degrees from ours and the other planets are much closer to being in the same plane.

But at such large distances, it is still significant isn't it?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
122
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
Back
Top