News Possible 2000 Presidential Election Fraud?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksle82
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a video featuring Clinton Curtis, who claims to have testified about vote-rigging software, raising questions about the credibility of his claims and the lack of mainstream media coverage at the time. Participants debate the nature of his testimony, with some clarifying that it was not a formal court testimony but rather an interview, possibly linked to a staged event by conspiracy theorists. There is skepticism regarding the validity of such testimonies, with comments highlighting that depositions can occur outside of court but questioning the effectiveness and credibility of the context in which Curtis spoke. Overall, the conversation reflects concerns about the implications of vote-rigging allegations and the reliability of sources discussing such serious topics.
ksle82
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I came upon this video on youutbe about a man named clinton curtis testifying on vote-rigging software: [MEDIA=youtube]PrwToR2RpEI[/MEDIA][/URL]


He seems to be very credible: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Curtis

I thought this is pretty shocking. just wondering why major news weren't covering this at the time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Who knows but it's too late to change the election results of 2000.
 
What is shocking about this?

Btw, "testify" implies a court - I'm guessing this is that mock court that was staged by conspiracy theorists a while back (you can't take a handheld video camera into a real court). Its an interview.
 
russ_watters said:
What is shocking about this?

Btw, "testify" implies a court - I'm guessing this is that mock court that was staged by conspiracy theorists a while back (you can't take a handheld video camera into a real court). Its an interview.

On the contrary, depositions are by definition testimony taken outside of court. But you're essentially right, what we have hear is the usual Congressional minority circle jerk getting together and deposing whatever crackheads they want. It's not a Congressional hearing, none of the deposing participants have subpeona power, and barring some significant discovery is ultimately worthless from a judicial point of view. The most that could ever come of these exercises is that some Congresscritter will drop it into the record or some blogger or board poster will attempt to pass it off as a supporting primary source.
 
This thread does not meet the criteria for posting.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
50
Views
6K
Replies
139
Views
16K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
593
Back
Top