A Possible decay process for a cubic scalar self-interaction

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the Lagrangian

$$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}h\partial^{\mu}h-\frac{1}{2}m^{2}h^{2}-\frac{\lambda}{3!}h^{3}$$

for a real scalar field ##h##.

This is the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian with a cubic self-interaction term.

Does this model allow the decay process

$$h \rightarrow h + h?$$

Clearly, in the rest frame, the incoming scalar is at rest, so its total energy is its rest energy, and therefore, it cannot decay to two copies of itself (with twice the rest energy), as that would violate energy conservation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:
Consider the Lagrangian

$$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}h\partial^{\mu}h-\frac{1}{2}m^{2}h^{2}-\frac{\lambda}{3!}h^{3}$$

for a real scalar field ##h##.

This is the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian with a cubic self-interaction term.

Does this model allow the decay process

$$h \rightarrow h + h?$$

Clearly, in the rest frame, the incoming scalar is at rest, so its total energy is its rest energy, and therefore, it cannot decay to two copies of itself (with twice the rest energy), as that would violate energy conservation?
You are correct, the decay cannot take place due to its violation of energy-momentum conservation.
 
But gluons can split into two or more gluons, right?

And gluons are massive.
 
failexam said:
But gluons can split into two or more gluons, right?

And gluons are massive.
Gluons are actually massless.

By the way, it is possible of course to have one h particle turning into two h particles with these off-shell. But there cannot be an actual decay of one h into two on-shell ("real") h particles
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top