Possible Errors in Writing Christoffel Symbols with a Symmetric Metric

Fisica
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



¿Why \Gamma^{k}_{i j} = (1/2) g^{k p} (g_{i p ,j}+ g_{j p ,i}- g_{i j , p}) can't be writed like \Gamma^{k}_{i j} = (1/2) g^{k p} (2 g_{i p ,j}+g_{i j , p})

if i can say that the metric is symmetric?

Homework Equations



That is the relevant equation

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think that ##g_{ip},_j = g_{jp},_i## ? Certainly, ##g_{ij} = g_{ji}##, but that's not what you've got here.

Also what makes you think that ##g_{ij},_p = -g_{ji},_p##, or was that sign error just a typo?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top