Possible fusion power plants of the future

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the safety and operational principles of future fusion power plants compared to stellar fusion processes. Participants explore the differences in plasma conditions, containment methods, and the implications of these factors for safety and efficiency in fusion energy generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assertion that fusion power plants would be inherently safe, suggesting that if plasma containment fails, fusion would cease immediately, but this could lead to damage to the reactor.
  • Others argue that the plasma density and conditions in stars are vastly greater than those achievable in terrestrial tokamaks, which affects the stability and longevity of stellar fusion compared to man-made fusion.
  • It is noted that the temperature in tokamaks can be higher than in the core of the Sun, but the absence of gravitational pressure on Earth complicates the fusion process.
  • Some participants emphasize that pressure in fusion reactors is maintained by magnetic fields rather than gravity, which is a significant difference from stellar conditions.
  • There are corrections regarding the understanding of pressure and temperature relationships in plasma, with references to the ideal gas law and energy balance considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the safety and operational characteristics of fusion power plants compared to stars, with no consensus reached on the implications of these differences.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the role of gravity in stellar fusion versus terrestrial fusion, and the dependence on specific conditions such as plasma density and magnetic field strength, which remain unresolved.

hagar
Gold Member
Messages
57
Reaction score
22
Question about fusion power sources. An article I just read stated that they would be safe as if anything went wrong they would just stop working. Is this correct ? If so than why do stars continue to burn and seem (to me at least) to be self feeding.

Respectfully,
Pat Hagar
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hagar said:
An article I just read stated that they would be safe as if anything went wrong they would just stop working. Is this correct ?
If the plasma reaches the first wall, it loses heat rapidly, i.e., it is quenched and the fusion process would cease. The plasma density is on the order of 1014 particles/cm3.
hagar said:
If so than why do stars continue to burn and seem (to me at least) to be self feeding.
Think of the size of stars compared to the Sun or our planet, and then think about the size of a power plant compared to the plant. Stars are orders of magnitude greater in size and mass compared to a power plant [understatement].

The plasma density, temperatures and pressures are much, much greater than we could ever achieve in a terrestrial tokamak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_core
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/interior.shtml
https://fusedweb.llnl.gov/CPEP/Chart_Pages/5.Plasmas/SunLayers.html

The sun has been around for about 4.5 billion years, so it's remarkably stable. Occasional CMEs blow off a very small fraction of a percentage of solar mass.

If you're standing on the photosphere of the sun -- the "surface", the gravitational strength of the sun will be about 27.9 times that of the Earth, if you were standing on the surface of the Earth. In metric units, on Earth, the acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 meters/sec^2, so on the Sun, that would be 273.7 meters/sec^2.
Ref: https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=1063
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagar
This would be "safe" by comparison with nuclear fission plants.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagar
Astronuc said:
The plasma density, temperatures and pressures are much, much greater than we could ever achieve in a terrestrial tokamak.
The temperature in tokamaks (if they do fusion) is higher than in the core of sun, roughly a factor of 7.We don't have gravitational pressure, if anything goes wrong and the plasma containment gets lost. fusion stops immediately. In the worst case, some parts of the reactor wall will melt. Bad for the reactor, but not dangerous for anyone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagar
mfb said:
The temperature in tokamaks (if they do fusion) is higher than in the core of sun, roughly a factor of 7.

Fascinating, I had no idea of this.

Than size,density and gravity controlling pressure and temperature would be the limiting factors.
Thanks to all for the responses and links.

Respectfully,
Pat Hagar
 
There is no relevant gravity in the plasma on Earth. Pressure is maintained by the magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagar
mfb said:
There is no relevant gravity in the plasma on Earth. Pressure is maintained by the magnetic field.

I thank you for the correction. My comment was not stated correctly. I meant the gravity of the sun maintains the pressure and temperature.

Respectfully,
Pat Hagar
 
mfb said:
The temperature in tokamaks (if they do fusion) is higher than in the core of sun, roughly a factor of 7.
Thanks for the correction. I had switched the numbers.

hagar said:
Than size,density and gravity controlling pressure and temperature would be the limiting factors.
As mfb mentioned Earth's gravity is relatively weak. The pressure is determined by the plasma density and temperature (P = nkT), and it is counter balanced by the magnetic field, which is limited by what field the superconducting magnets can provide. The temperature is determined by the energy balance in the plasma, with the goal that energy generated by fusion would greatly exceed the loses from the plasma.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagar
Astronuc said:
Thanks for the correction. I had switched the numbers.As mfb mentioned Earth's gravity is relatively weak. The pressure is determined by the plasma density and temperature (P = nkT), and it is counter balanced by the magnetic field, which is limited by what field the superconducting magnets can provide. The temperature is determined by the energy balance in the plasma, with the goal that energy generated by fusion would greatly exceed the loses from the plasma.
Thank you for the correction, it seems I did it again. I was referring to the suns fusion process and not to a local power plant.

Respectfully,
Pat Hagar
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K