Potential and Kinetic Energy Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) of a softball thrown straight up. The PE at the highest point is calculated to be 59.584 J, but there is confusion about determining KE without knowing the velocity. Participants suggest using conservation of energy principles, noting that KE equals PE at the moment of release and when the ball returns to the thrower. Kinematic equations are also mentioned as a method to find velocity using distance and acceleration due to gravity. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that KE and PE are interconnected through energy conservation, allowing for calculations based on known values.
CeceBear
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You throw a softball (of mass 400g) straight up into the air. It reaches a maximum altitude of 15.2m and then returns to you.
What is the gravitational potential energy of the softball at its highest position? Assume the ball departed from and returned to ground level.
Assume no energy is lost by the softball while it is in the air.
What is the kinetic energy of the softball as soon as it leaves your hand?
What is the kinetic energy of the softball when it returns to your hand?
What is the speed of the ball?


Homework Equations


PE = mgh
KE = (1/2)mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I've already calculated the PE to be 59.584 J. I'm not sure how to calculate KE without a velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can try using the conservation of energy principle. Or use the kinematic motion equations. Have you tried either method?
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can try using the conservation of energy principle. Or use the kinematic motion equations. Have you tried either method?

But I only have distance. I don't have time, acceleration, or velocity for the kinematic equations. And according to the conservation of energy law, wouldn't KE just be -PE?
 
I think you are forgetting one more equation
total energy: KE+PE
so you can try setting up like this using conservation of energy
Initial Total Energy=Final Total Energy

as for kinematic equations, you do have acceleration. You can figure out velocity by finding time it takes to reach the top or fall to the ground using kinematics
funny I just had a question about Conservation of energy as well >_>...starting a new thread..

wouldn't KE just be -PE?
KE would equal to PE (not -PE) but this depends on when you are talking about. (it would be true if use KE when PE=0 and PE when KE=0)
 
Last edited:
Ok, I think I've got it now. Thank you very much!
 
Using the known distance, gravity, and the fact that its velocity is zero at its highest point you can find its final velocity
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top