Potential Difference and flow of current

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatics, it's clarified that even with a zero potential difference, current can still flow through a wire due to the assumption of ideal wires, which have negligible resistance. The voltage drop across the wire is considered minimal compared to that across other components, allowing for current flow despite ΔV being zero. This discussion highlights the importance of approximations in circuit analysis, particularly in understanding how current behaves in practical scenarios. Real wires do have some resistance, but superconductors represent a unique case. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the role of ideal conditions in electrical theory.
UchihaClan13
Messages
145
Reaction score
12
Okay guys
I am a beginner (in electrostatics as i just started studying it)
I am thorough with kirchhoffs rules/laws
But one thing which bugs me is this doubt
So in the book that i am reading
It says that even if the potential difference is zero,current flows through a wire
I don't get how
I mean
After all isn't ΔV=IR
so ifΔV is zero and so is R doesn't that mean that I is infinity or indeterminate
I am guessing the answer's got to do with some sort of assumption/approximation
But could you guys help me out?
Help is much appreciated!:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you give some context? Like what was said before that statement? Or just post a picture of the page please
 
UchihaClan13 said:
I am guessing the answer's got to do with some sort of assumption/approximation
It's an approximation, yes. Voltage drop across the wire is so small compared to that across the components that it is taken as 0. Wires are assumed to be ideal. In practice, they do have some resistance. Superconductors are an exception, but that's a different topic.
 
cnh1995 said:
It's an approximation, yes. Voltage drop across the wire is so small compared to that across the components that it is taken as 0. Wires are assumed to be ideal. In practice, they do have some resistance. Superconductors are an exception, but that's a different topic.
Okay
i get it
Those approximations again
Thanks for clarifying my doubt!:)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top