Potential difference between charged parallel plates

AI Thread Summary
The electric field between charged parallel plates is constant, and the potential difference is calculated as the product of the electric field and the distance between the plates. When moving a positive charge from a negatively charged plate to a positively charged plate, using the formula for electric potential V=kq/r presents a problem as r approaches zero. This formula is applicable to point charges, not plates, and as a positive charge approaches the plate, positive particles on the plate redistribute, preventing r from reaching zero. Even if a charge were fixed to a point on the plate, the surrounding charges would adjust, maintaining a distance. The discussion highlights the importance of considering charge redistribution when analyzing potential differences in conductive materials.
Robin64
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
So we know that the E-field between two parallel plates is constant and that the potential difference between the plates is just the E-field times the distance between the plates. Let's say we're moving a positive charge from a negatively charged plate to a positively charge plate ( or near), and instead of using the E-field and distance between the plates to calculate the potential difference, we instead just want to use the formula for electric potential, V=kq/r. How do we deal with the r=0 that inevitably crops up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The V=kq/r formula is for forces between two point particles, not two plates. To use it you need to focus on a positively charged particle, call it p, on the positive plate, and the forces between that and the moving positive particle, call it q. But since the plate is conductive, as q nears the plate, p, as well as all other positive particles, will move away from the point on the plate that q is approaching, so we will never get to a situation where r is zero. Even if we could somehow attach q immovably to a point on the plate, a new equilibrium would be achieved in which all the other positive particles arrange themselves at a distance from p.
 
That makes sense. I completely forgot to consider that the charge redistribution that would occur with a charge near a plate with like charge.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top