Potential Difference in a Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating potential differences in a capacitor after inserting a dielectric slab. The original potential difference is 1030 volts with an air gap of 2 mm, and the slab has a dielectric constant of 5.1. The key equations involve the relationship between electric field, potential difference, and distance, with adjustments for the dielectric material. The correct approach includes dividing the total potential difference by the dielectric constant to find the potential across the slab. Understanding how to apply these principles is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
cowmoo32
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


16-70.jpg


An isolated large-plate capacitor (not connected to anything) originally has a potential difference of 1030 volts with an air gap of 2 mm. Then a plastic slab 1 mm thick, with dielectric constant 5.1, is inserted into the middle of the air gap as shown in Figure 16.70. As shown in the diagram, location 1 is at the left plate of the capacitor, location 2 is at the left edge of the plastic slab, location 3 is at the right edge of the slab, and location 4 is at the right plate of the capacitor. All of these locations are near the center of the capacitor. Calculate the following potential differences.
V1 - V2 =
V2 - V3 =
V3 - V4 =
V1 - V4 =

Homework Equations



deltaV = E (deltaL)

The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed that the equation for deltaV would work for this problem, but apparently not. I am completely lost right now. I thought that V1-V2 would be (1030/5.1)(.0005) Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
cowmoo32,

Let's review what we have:

\Delta V = 1030 = \Delta V_{1 \rightarrow 4}

K = 5.1

s_{tot} = .002m

s_{1} = .0005m

s_{2} = .001m

s_{3} = .0005m

with,

\Delta V = E \cdot s

and

\Delta V_{tot} = \sum^n_{i=1} \Delta V_i

One accounts for the dielectric constant of the insulator in the following fashion:

\Delta V_{insulator} = \frac{\Delta V_{space}}{K}.

To get the \Delta V_{1 \rightarrow 2}, we recognize that

s_{1} = .0005m = \frac{s_{tot}}{4}

Hence,

\Delta V_{1 \rightarrow 2}= E \cdot s_{1} = E \cdot \frac{s_{tot}}{4} = \frac{\Delta V}{4}

That should be enough information to give you the correct answer. Make sure to account for the dielectric constant of the insulator.

- Happy Problem Solving -
 
[hit submit too many times]
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top