Potential Energy and Conservation of Energy Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a pendulum with a 4.0 kg stone and a 3.2 m string. Key points include calculating the speed of the stone at a 62° angle to the vertical and determining the maximum angle it can reach during its motion. The total mechanical energy of the system is established as the kinetic energy at the lowest point, which is used to find potential energy at different heights. The participant successfully calculates the height change and finds the speed to be 5.10 m/s at the specified angle. The conversation emphasizes understanding energy conservation principles in pendulum motion.
ChazyChazLive
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum consists of a 4.0 kg stone swinging on a 3.2 m string of negligible mass. The stone has a speed of 7.7 m/s when it passes its lowest point.

Homework Equations


(a) What is the speed when the string is at 62° to the vertical?
(b) What is the greatest angle with the vertical that the string will reach during the stone's motion?
(c) If the potential energy of the pendulum-Earth system is taken to be zero at the stone's lowest point, what is the total mechanical energy of the system?

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm all confused >.< I figured there wold be max KE in the middle. Then there would be some KE & PE at the 62 degree part.. but idn what to do.. ugh I tried Ei = Ef so then Ei = .5mv2 but what would Ef be... idn.. i was thinking about centripetal force... idn I'm hopeless >.<
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ME [Mechanical Energy] = KE [Kinetic Energy] + PE [Potential Energy]
At the stone's lowest point you could take the PE to be 0J (since it could be taken as the reference level); the KE at that point would then be the total mechanical energy of the system. At 62deg to the vertical, find the height above the reference level to solve for the PE. The difference between the ME and PE at that point is the KE. Then solve for the speed. The greatest angle would occur at the height where KE = 0.
 

hmm...
okie...
I was thinking of finding the height change, but I confuse myself sometimes. I couldn't figure out how to get it. So, you're supposed to do 3.2cos(62) = 1.502
And then do 3.2 - 1.502 = 1.698 which will equal the height change...
So now..
E (which equals the KE initial) = KE + PE
so plug in numbers 118.58 = (.5)(4)v^2 + (4)(9.8)(1.698)
v = 5.10 m/s

ooh yay! tehehe gots it!

and then basically work backwards for the angle
so E = mgh

and then for C.. it's just the E we've been working with

thankyou very much! ^_^ highly appreciated XD

 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top