Potential energy of a charge system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of potential energy in a system of charges, specifically in the context of electromagnetism for aerospace engineering. A newcomer to the forum seeks clarification on a statement from their textbook regarding the symmetry of potential energy in charge systems. The key point is that potential energy is defined for a system rather than individual charges. It emphasizes that the formula for potential energy is symmetric, meaning it does not differentiate between charges, indicating that potential energy is a characteristic of the entire system. This symmetry reinforces the idea that potential energy cannot be attributed to a single particle but rather to the interactions within a group of charges. The discussion concludes with the newcomer expressing understanding of this concept.
agolkar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm new to the forum and I congratulate with everyone of here for the nice scientific forum you've set up :smile:
I apologize in advance for my poor english (especially about scientific terms!), but I hope I can explain my doubt. I'm currently studying for the Electromagnetism exam for my aerospace engineering degree.

After the enunciation of the formula of the potential energy for a charge system (U=1/2 1/(4*pi*epsilon) etc..), in my book I read the following statement about the topic in subject:

"it comes back the simmetric structure regarding the charges, that corresponds the fact that the potential energy of a charge system in every possible configuration is a characteristic of the system in its complex".

The original text in italian is the following (for the curious ones :biggrin: ):

"torna di nuovo la struttura simmetrica rispetto alle cariche, che
corrisponde all'essere l'energia potenziale di un sistema di cariche in ogni
sua possibile configurazione una caratteristica del sistema nel suo insieme


The same assertion about the symmetry regarding the charges is made when introducting the potential energy itself... anyway I cannot understand the point :frown: can someone help me, please?

Thanks in advance :smile:
Alessandro
 
Physics news on Phys.org
electric potential energy

Well, if I understand what you meant, here is the answer.

The author is trying to say that the potential energy is defined only for a system. For example, potential energy of a group of charges, potential energy of the earth-stone system. You can't say potential energy of the electron, rather, potenitial energy of the electron-proton system.

I hope it helps. Tell me if you meant something else.


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
thank you for your answer :)
yes, i think that's the point.
but i cannot understand the relation of it with the symmetry of the formula regarding the charges... any idea?

thanks again :smile:
 
symmetry and Electric potential energy

Agolkar,

If you look at the formula, you observe that by looking at it, you cannot tell whether you have written the potential energy of Particle A or Particle B.
That is, the formula is symmetric with A and B. ( or with all the charges if there are many ).

So, that means, potential energy is not for a particle. Rather, for a system. And the formula tells that too.

spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
thanks! :cool: i understood!
very clever :smile:
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top