Potential energy of a spring and transverse motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the potential energy of a spring and its behavior during transverse motion. The key equation used is W = 1/2kL^2, where L represents the stretched distance. Participants explore how to parameterize the stretch of the spring as a function of the distance moved, xm, and emphasize the need to relate the height L(x) to the distance x. Confusion arises regarding the assumption that the work done in different scenarios is the same, leading to discussions about deriving the force needed to extend the spring. Ultimately, the solution hinges on correctly determining L(x) to find the force required for the spring's extension.
jskro
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Picture6.png


L = Stretched distance
L0 = Unstretched distance

Homework Equations


W = 1/2kL2


The Attempt at a Solution


In attempting to help a friend with this problem, having taken this same physics class under a different professor, i was completely stumped by this problem. I know that Fx = kL, but i can't make any headway on figuring out the part of the problem that involves the transverse of the spring that leads to a distance pulled of xm with the same applied force that stretches the spring the same distance. Is there something easy that I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a) you need to parameterise the amount it has stretched in fig b as a function of x. Geometrically think of take the stretched spring in b, and rotating it back to vertical. Then consider the relation between the extrat height L(x) and the distance it was moved x. After this I presume you are okay?
 
gash789 said:
For a) you need to parameterise the amount it has stretched in fig b as a function of x. Geometrically think of take the stretched spring in b, and rotating it back to vertical. Then consider the relation between the extrat height L(x) and the distance it was moved x. After this I presume you are okay?

So basically, because the work done in each of the two scenarios is the same?

Fx*xm = 1/2kL^2
xm = (kL^2)/(2Fx)
 
You do not know that the work done is the same, you just follow the prescribed method to determine it. I'm getting a bit confused by what you mean by

Fx*xm = 1/2kL^2
xm = (kL^2)/(2Fx)

What do you think is the answer to question a), Ie L(x)=? once you know this, then you can consider the force needed to extend the spring by L(x), and that is the answer to question b).
 
By rotating b back vertically, the distance it was pulled is xm

L(x) = xm
 
Exactly, so now you can find the magnitude of the force easily enough, the rest follows from this.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top