Potential Energy of a system of Point Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the position of a third charge -q in a system of two identical charges q to achieve zero potential energy. The potential energy equations used include U=W=k(q1q2/r), with the goal of setting the total work W to zero. Participants clarify the algebraic steps needed to derive a quadratic equation for the distance d, with one suggesting a correction to the formula used. The final solution for the position of the third charge is given as x=(15/2)±(5√5/2). The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in solving for d.
Tybstar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two identical charges q are placed on the x axis, one at the origin and the other at x = 5 cm. A third charge -q is placed on the x-axis so the potential energy of the three-charge system is the same as the potential energy at infinite separation. Its x coordinate is: (x=13)

Homework Equations



I know the correct answer to this one because I'm looking over a marked up test in preparation for the final.

I've been using the equations for the electric potential energy of a system of point charges:

U=W=k\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



...and expanding that to the work of the entire system:

W=0=W_{12}+W_{23}+W_{13}

so,W=0=k\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{5}+k\frac{q_{2}q_{3}}{d}+k\frac{q_{1}q_{3}}{5+d}

Since q_{3} is negative, simplify:

W=0=k\frac{q^{2}}{5}-k\frac{q^{2}}{d}-k\frac{q^{2}}{5+d}I might be missing something simple in algebra, but I can't figure out how to simplify this down enough to solve for d.

Any ideas? Am I even on the right track here?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kq^2 can be eliminated (as the right hand side is equal to zero), and this leaves you with:

\frac{1}{5} -\frac{1}{d} -\frac{1}{5+d}=0. Take the negative terms to one side and cross multiply to get a quadratic equation in d. Solve quadratic for d. There are two possible solutions as this is a quadratic.
 
I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that I tried doing a quadratic, but was unable to get the correct answer. Also, I think that the correct term should be \frac{1}{(d-5)}, not \frac{1}{5+d}.
 
Yes. You're right. I didnt look at the whole post. The solution, however, is x=\frac{15}{2}+-\frac{5\sqrt{5}}{2}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top