Potential energy variation = work of -(conservative forces)

AI Thread Summary
The variation in potential energy between two points is equal to the work done by the opposite of conservative forces acting between those points. This relationship is derived from the principle of conservation of energy, where the total energy before and after an event remains constant. The equation ΔK = -ΔU illustrates that a decrease in kinetic energy corresponds to an increase in potential energy, reinforcing the conservation principle. The discussion emphasizes that this equivalence holds true only when external forces are conservative. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving energy conservation in physics.
AntoineCompagnie
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is potential energy variation between two points equals to the work of the opposite of conservative forces between these two points?

Homework Equations



If we call these forces $$\vec F_ext^C$$

\begin{equation}
\Delta E_p=E_p(B)-E_p(A)=-\sum W_{A\rightarrow B}(\vec F_{ext}^C)
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was the opposite of the kinetic energy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When we're dealing with conservative forces we know that all the energy before has to be equal to the energy after, that's why they're called conservative forces. Because of that we have
Kbefore + Ubefore = Kafter + Uafter
Kafter - Kbefore = Ubefore - Uafter
ΔK = -ΔU
However, the Work-Energy theorem tells us that ΔK = W, so that W = -ΔU
(K stands to kinetic energy, U stands to potential energy and W stands to work)
 
  • Like
Likes AntoineCompagnie
##\Delta K =- \Delta U## is just because there was more kinetic energy before than after, isn't it?
And I'm dealing with Potenial energy, not kinetic one, does it change something?
 
AntoineCompagnie said:
##\Delta K =- \Delta U## is just because there was more kinetic energy before than after, isn't it?
And I'm dealing with Potenial energy, not kinetic one, does it change something?
Think about you just said: Kafter < Kbefore ∴ Kafter - Kbefore < 0, if ΔK < 0 then ΔU > 0, right? So what does it means? It means that when the variation of kinetic energy decrease then the variation of potential energy will increase, because it must conserve energy, just think about the energy conservation when dealing with conservative forces.
So in fact you can say either ΔK = W or ΔU = - W since ΔK + ΔU = 0, in other words, W - W = 0 (which holds).
But it's really really important for you to remember that this is only true when there's energy conservation, hence the external force is conservative.
 
  • Like
Likes AntoineCompagnie
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top