Potential energy variation = work of -(conservative forces)

AI Thread Summary
The variation in potential energy between two points is equal to the work done by the opposite of conservative forces acting between those points. This relationship is derived from the principle of conservation of energy, where the total energy before and after an event remains constant. The equation ΔK = -ΔU illustrates that a decrease in kinetic energy corresponds to an increase in potential energy, reinforcing the conservation principle. The discussion emphasizes that this equivalence holds true only when external forces are conservative. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving energy conservation in physics.
AntoineCompagnie
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is potential energy variation between two points equals to the work of the opposite of conservative forces between these two points?

Homework Equations



If we call these forces $$\vec F_ext^C$$

\begin{equation}
\Delta E_p=E_p(B)-E_p(A)=-\sum W_{A\rightarrow B}(\vec F_{ext}^C)
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was the opposite of the kinetic energy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When we're dealing with conservative forces we know that all the energy before has to be equal to the energy after, that's why they're called conservative forces. Because of that we have
Kbefore + Ubefore = Kafter + Uafter
Kafter - Kbefore = Ubefore - Uafter
ΔK = -ΔU
However, the Work-Energy theorem tells us that ΔK = W, so that W = -ΔU
(K stands to kinetic energy, U stands to potential energy and W stands to work)
 
  • Like
Likes AntoineCompagnie
##\Delta K =- \Delta U## is just because there was more kinetic energy before than after, isn't it?
And I'm dealing with Potenial energy, not kinetic one, does it change something?
 
AntoineCompagnie said:
##\Delta K =- \Delta U## is just because there was more kinetic energy before than after, isn't it?
And I'm dealing with Potenial energy, not kinetic one, does it change something?
Think about you just said: Kafter < Kbefore ∴ Kafter - Kbefore < 0, if ΔK < 0 then ΔU > 0, right? So what does it means? It means that when the variation of kinetic energy decrease then the variation of potential energy will increase, because it must conserve energy, just think about the energy conservation when dealing with conservative forces.
So in fact you can say either ΔK = W or ΔU = - W since ΔK + ΔU = 0, in other words, W - W = 0 (which holds).
But it's really really important for you to remember that this is only true when there's energy conservation, hence the external force is conservative.
 
  • Like
Likes AntoineCompagnie
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top