Potential Energy -- What are the different ways it can be stored?

AI Thread Summary
Potential energy can be stored in various forms, including gravitational, electrostatic, and elastic potential energy. It is defined as the work needed to move a mass from one position to another within a force field. Examples include mass at height, tense springs, and nuclear energy, which involves the conversion of mass into energy. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding potential energy at a fundamental level, noting that it can also be viewed as a mathematical construct. Overall, potential energy encompasses a wide range of physical phenomena and is crucial in both classical and quantum physics contexts.
neomahakala108
Gold Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Potential energy is energy contained in certain system, for example in physical body mass in gravitational field of Earth.

Potential energy at initial position has value equal to work necessary to move mass from initial position to new position.

But also, i read that potential energy can also be stored in other ways.

It'd be nice if someone elaborated examples, especially interrested in Quantum Physics & Electronics examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neomahakala108 said:
Potential energy is energy contained in certain system, for example in physical body mass in gravitational field of Earth.

Potential energy at initial position has value equal to work necessary to move mass from initial position to new position.

But also, i read that potential energy can also be stored in other ways.

It'd be nice if someone elaborated examples, especially interrested in Quantum Physics & Electronics examples.

Well, there's electrostatic potential energy, and elastic potential energy. You can assign a potential energy function to any conservative force field as far as I know.
 
  • Like
Likes neomahakala108
Are you looking for a simple list? Why don't you start by listing what you can think of?
 
  • Like
Likes neomahakala108
Khashishi said:
Are you looking for a simple list? Why don't you start by listing what you can think of?

i know too little of physics & related english words to speak about this properly.

but i'll list examples:

- mass at height,
- tense spring (not sure if i translated this well),
- chemical energy (not sure if it's correct),
- solar energy (not sure if it's correct).
 
Solar energy isn't a good example. Solar energy comes from nuclear fusion reactions of hydrogen and heavier elements. But there are nuclear reactions happening outside the sun, also. So it is better to put nuclear energy in the list rather than solar energy. Any nuclear or chemical reaction that gives off energy converts a small amount of mass into energy, so you could consider all mass to be a form of potential energy, depending on context. Any mass at rest can in principle be completely converted to kinetic energy (including photons) by annihilating it with an equal supply of antimatter.

It might be useful to consider how potential energy is stored at a more fundamental level. Springs and other elastic objects store energy in the electric field, since it is the displacement of the chemical bonds which is responsible for the elasticity. Levitating a mass stores energy in the gravitational field. Nuclear fuel stores energy in the strong nuclear bonds.

I've given a very physical picture of potential energy, but you can also think of potential energy as a mathematical construct--a bookkeeping engine. I prefer to think of potential energy in terms of real measurable things.
 
  • Like
Likes neomahakala108
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top