Potential energy. What is the spring constant?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant for an 8.00 kg stone compressing a spring by 10.0 cm. Initially, the user attempted to use the conservation of mechanical energy, equating gravitational potential energy to elastic potential energy, leading to an incorrect calculation of the spring constant. The correct approach involves recognizing that the stone was gently lowered to the equilibrium position, which alters the energy balance. The final consensus indicates that the correct formula for the spring constant is k = 2mg/h, resulting in a value of 784 N/m. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which energy conservation applies in such scenarios.
Y*_max
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Figure 8-36 shows an 8.00 kg stone at rest on a spring. The spring is compressed 10.0 cm by the stone. (a) What is the spring constant?

2. Relevant formula
Mechanical energy is conserved

The Attempt at a Solution


The decrease in gravitational potential energy that occurs when the block is put on the spring (the spring is compressed) is equal to the increase in elastic potential energy of the spring.
Thus: mgh=0.5kh^2 (the coordinate system is chosen so that gravitational potential energy is zero when the block is at rest and the spring is compressed)
Solving the equation for k gives k=2gm/h
k=2*9.8*8.0/0.1=1568 N/m.

Yet, the answer turns out to be 784N/m :/
What did I do wrong?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The downward force on the force is equal to mg.
The restoring force by the spring in opposite direction is kx, equating
8g=k/10
K=9.8*8*10=784N
 
AbhinavJ said:
8g=k/10
K=9.8*8*10=784N
its 10 cm so you should take 0.1m , And you missed a factor of 2

Y*_max said:
The decrease in gravitational potential energy that occurs when the block is put on the spring (the spring is compressed) is equal to the increase in elastic potential energy of the spring.
not necessarily true! There is no diagram! Anyway, try equating mg = kx , you won't get the same answer! Was the body dropped suddenly or slowly lowered down to equilibrium?
 
Last edited:
Max' question "what did I do wrong ?" still stands !

You did an energy balance for a situation where all potential energy from gravity is converted into mechanical energy to compress the spring.
That would be: let go of the stone at the top of the uncompressed spring and see where the mass stops moving (i.e. the motion reverses direction). However, at that point the energy in the spring is enough to push the stone back to the original postition (again with potential energy mgh and no kinetic energy) where the sequence would repeat.

That is not what was given in the exercise. The stone was lowered gently until equilibrium position. The hand that lowered the stone took away half the potential energy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes AbhinavJ
Suraj M said:
it's ## k=\frac{2mg}{h^2}##
No, it definitely is not. Max did the ##
k=\frac{2mgh}{h^2}## just fine, only the energy balance didn't apply for the situation described.
 
  • Like
Likes AbhinavJ
BvU said:
No, it definitely is not. Max did the k=2mghh2 k=\frac{2mgh}{h^2} just fine, only the energy balance didn't apply for the situation described.
I realized that 12 mins ago,BvU :smile: changed it, sorry!
 
Oh, I see! Thank you very much to you all!
 
Back
Top