Potential Energy: Why Don't We Use Product Rule?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the potential energy function U = -U0x² and the confusion regarding the use of the product rule. The user initially questions why the first term appears unchanged after differentiation, leading to confusion about treating U0 as a constant. It is clarified that U0 is indeed a constant, and when applying the product rule, the derivative of a constant is zero, which simplifies the expression. Ultimately, the user realizes that differentiating correctly yields the expected result, confirming their understanding of the differentiation process. This highlights the importance of recognizing constants in calculus.
matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



i wasnt really sure where to put this question. its kind of a maths question i suppose

the potential energy funtion u along the x-axis is given as

U=-U0x2

the question is really why do i not use the product rule on this equation as it is two variable multiplied together

i am told that the answer is u02x
but I am a bit confused as to why you don't seem to do anythign with the first term apart from multiplied by -1 but still remains there. Is it to be treated as a constant? if so why does it not = 0 when differentiated.

any help would be appreciated =]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
matt_crouch said:
i am told that the answer is u02x
but I am a bit confused as to why you don't seem to do anythign with the first term apart from multiplied by -1 but still remains there. Is it to be treated as a constant? if so why does it not = 0 when differentiated.
I presume the question is to find the force given that potential function. In any case, U0 is a constant. Go ahead and use the product rule if you like; the derivative of a constant is zero.

If y = ax2, what's dy/dx? (a is a constant)
 
sorry ye the question to find the force. and y=ax2 will differentiate to 2x but i don't understand in the question the answer has the constant still in it after its be differentiated

:/
 
aaahh wait i see if i differentiate it using the product rule i do get that answer..
i see why now

dy/dx= da/dx.x2+2x.a but because da/dx = 0 it removes the whole of the first term.

makes more sense now
cheers
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top