Potential of a dipole in E field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the potential energy of a dipole in an electric field, specifically aiming to show that U = -p.E. The user attempts to start from the potential of two charges but encounters difficulties in transitioning from U = q(VB - VA) to the desired equation. The challenge arises from the differing distances in the potential terms and the absence of an acosθ term in their approximation. It is noted that the potential energy of the dipole's interaction with the external field varies with angle, while the interaction potential remains constant. The conversation highlights the importance of considering the external field's contribution to the potential energy.
raggle
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm going over some EM notes and I found a derivation for the potential energy of a dipole in an E field which first found the torque on the dipole and then integrated.
I had a go at a derivation that goes the other way, starting from the potential of the 2 charges. I've ran into a bit of a problem midway through and I can't see how to get past it.

Homework Equations



Want to show:
U = -p.E

The Attempt at a Solution


U = q(VB-VA)

now I don't know how to get from here to what I want to show. Both of the potentials look like \frac{q}{4πε<sub>0</sub>r} , where the r is different in either potential.
The only thing I can think of is to use an approximation to r, but that doesn't give an acosθ term in the numerator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raggle said:

Homework Statement



I'm going over some EM notes and I found a derivation for the potential energy of a dipole in an E field which first found the torque on the dipole and then integrated.
I had a go at a derivation that goes the other way, starting from the potential of the 2 charges. I've ran into a bit of a problem midway through and I can't see how to get past it.

Homework Equations



Want to show:
U = -p.E

The Attempt at a Solution


U = q(VB-VA)

now I don't know how to get from here to what I want to show. Both of the potentials look like \frac{q}{4πε_0 r} , where the r is different in either potential.
The only thing I can think of is to use an approximation to r, but that doesn't give an acosθ term in the numerator.

The charges of the dipole are in an external electric field. By changing the angle, that potential energy gained from the field changes, the potential energy of their interaction does not. You ignored the contribution of the external field to the potential energy.

As for the potential energy of the interaction between two point charges, it is \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r} where r is the distance between the charges.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top