Potential of charged disk for x R

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the potential of a charged disk along its axis at a distance x from the center. The potential formula is given, and the user struggles to see how the expression simplifies for x much larger than R. They mistakenly believe that the term under the radical should simplify to zero, leading to an incorrect conclusion that the potential is zero. The solution involves using the binomial approximation to expand the square root, clarifying how the expression transitions from \(\sqrt{R^2 + x^2} - x\) to the correct approximation. The explanation resolves the confusion, highlighting the importance of the binomial expansion in this context.
qamptr
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I understand the answer to this part of the problem intuitively but there's definitely something in the math that I'm missing--

Homework Statement


Along the axis through the center of a charged disk, for a point P at a distance x from the center, the potential will be

\frac{Q}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}R^{2}}\left[\sqrt{R^{2}+x^{2}}-x\right]

Homework Equations


For x>>R, I'm supposed to understand that this reduces to

V\approx\frac{Q}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}R^{2}}\left[x\left(1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{R^{2}}{x^2}\right)-x\right]=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}x}

The Attempt at a Solution


As I said, I understand that this must work out, but I'm misunderstanding something about the math. It seems as though the term under the radical above ought to become just x^{2} for x>>R, and thus inside the brackets x-x=0 and then V=0, which is untrue. Could someone please explain how \left[\sqrt{R^{2}+x^{2}}-x\right] becomes \left[x\left(1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{R^{2}}{x^2}\right)-x\right] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
qamptr said:
Could someone please explain how \left[\sqrt{R^{2}+x^{2}}-x\right] becomes \left[x\left(1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{R^{2}}{x^2}\right)-x\right] ?

Bring the x^2 term outside the radical, then apply the general binomial expansion formula for (1+y)^(1/2) = 1 + (1/2)y - ...
 
Binomial approximation will get you there.

\sqrt{R^2+x^2}=\sqrt{\frac{R^2 x^2}{x^2}+x^2}

Now use the approx
x \sqrt{\frac{R^2}{x^2}+1}=x(1+\frac{1}{2} \frac{R^2}{x^2})
 
Mindscrape said:
Binomial approximation will get you there.

\sqrt{R^2+x^2}=\sqrt{\frac{R^2 x^2}{x^2}+x^2}

Now use the approx
x \sqrt{\frac{R^2}{x^2}+1}=x(1+\frac{1}{2} \frac{R^2}{x^2})

*thumps forehead* thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top